The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Path Exchange Method for Hybrid LCA
Abstract
Hybrid techniques for Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) provide a way of combining the accuracy of process analysis and the completeness of input-output analysis. A number of methods have been suggested to implement a hybrid LCA in practice, with the main challenge being the integration of specific process data with an overarching input-output system. In this work we present a new hybrid LCA method which works at the finest input-output level of detail: structural paths. This new Path Exchange method avoids double-counting and system disturbance just as previous hybrid LCA methods, but instead of a large LCA database it requires only a minimum of external information on those structural paths that are to be represented by process data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citation
Cited by
Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H. C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S., & Palm, V. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.014 · Cited by 405
Self-citationEleftheriadis, S., Mumovic, D., & Greening, P. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.028 · Cited by 257
Hybrid life-cycle assessment for robust, best-practice carbon accounting
Kennelly, C., Berners-Lee, M., & Hewitt, C. N. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.231 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenzen, M., & Crawford, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-09-24
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8251-8256
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2068129708
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
