The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phytoremediation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls: New Trends and Promises
Open accessAbstract
Transgenic plants and associated bacteria constitute a new generation of genetically modified organisms for efficient and environment-friendly treatment of soil and water contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). This review focuses on recent advances in phytoremediation for the treatment of PCBs, including the development of transgenic plants and associated bacteria. Phytoremediation, or the use of higher plants for rehabilitation of soil and groundwater, is a promising strategy for cost-effective treatment of sites contaminated by toxic compounds, including PCBs. Plants can help mitigate environmental pollution by PCBs through a range of mechanisms: besides uptake from soil (phytoextraction), plants are capable of enzymatic transformation of PCBs (phytotransformation); by releasing a variety of secondary metabolites, plants also enhance the microbial activity in the root zone, improving biodegradation of PCBs (rhizoremediation). However, because of their hydrophobicity and chemical stability, PCBs are only slowly taken up and degraded by plants and associated bacteria, resulting in incomplete treatment and potential release of toxic metabolites into the environment. Moreover, naturally occurring plant-associated bacteria may not possess the enzymatic machinery necessary for PCB degradation. To overcome these limitations, bacterial genes involved in the metabolism of PCBs, such as biphenyl dioxygenases, have been introduced into higher plants, following a strategy similar to the development of transgenic crops. Similarly, bacteria have been genetically modified that exhibit improved biodegradation capabilities and are able to maintain stable relationships with plants. Transgenic plants and associated bacteria bring hope for a broader and more efficient application of phytoremediation for the treatment of PCBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytoremediation: A Promising Approach for Revegetation of Heavy Metal-Polluted Land
Yan, A., Wang, Y., Tan, S. N., Mohd Yusof, M. L., Ghosh, S., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00359 · Cited by 1,644
Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: A critical perspective
Megharaj, M., Ramakrishnan, B., Venkateswarlu, K., Sethunathan, N., & Naidu, R. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,014
Shahzad, B., Tanveer, M., Che, Z., Rehman, A., Cheema, S. A., Sharma, A., Song, H., Rehman, S. U., & Zhaorong, D. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.066 · Cited by 325
Passatore, L., Rossetti, S., Juwarkar, A. A., & Massacci, A. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.051 · Cited by 290
Microbial Biosorption of Metals
(2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0443-5 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Aken, B. V., Correa, P. A., & Schnoor, J. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2767-2776
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2033584807
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls: New Trends and Promises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es902514d
- The paper
- Aken, B. V., Correa, P. A., & Schnoor, J. L. (2010). Phytoremediation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls: New Trends and Promises. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902514d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.