The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Source Apportionment of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Collected from an Urban Location in Birmingham, U.K.
Abstract
Intensive seasonal sampling campaigns were undertaken at an urban location in Birmingham, U.K., in which high-volume samplers were used to collect particulate- and vapor-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by means of filter papers and polyurethane foam plugs. Eighteen PAH species were determined by reversed-phase HPLC. Additionally, the suspended particle loading of the air was measured gravimetrically. Dichotomous stacked filter units (DSFUs) were run simultaneously with the high-volumes enabling the collection of particulate matter representative of fine (<2.1 μm) and coarse sized (2.1−10 μm) fractions. Filters from the DSFUs were analyzed for 19 metal species [by proton induced X-ray emission (PIXE)], ammonium, elemental carbon, and various anions. Metal and PAH concentrations were observed to be broadly in line with concentrations measured at other urban areas throughout the U.K. Chemical source apportionment studies took the form of principal component analysis (PCA) followed by multi-linear regression analysis (MLRA). This multivariate technique enabled major air pollution source categories to be identified along with the quantitative contributions of pollutant species to each source group. The results demonstrate that a combination of measurements of PAH and inorganic pollutants is a far more powerful tracer of emission sources than PAH data alone. PAH were found to be associated predominantly with emissions from road traffic, although other sources such as fuel oil, coal combustion, and incineration also contribute. Road traffic accounts for 88% of ambient benzo[ a ]pyrene at our site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, Y., Tao, S., Shen, H., & Ma, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905756106 · Cited by 462
Harrison, R. M., Deacon, A. R., Jones, M. R., & Appleby, R. S. (1997) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00296-3 · Cited by 320
Self-citationReceptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment
Watson, J. G., Zhu, T., Chow, J. C., Engelbrecht, J., Fujita, E. M., & Wilson, W. E. (2002) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00243-6 · Cited by 299
Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Mumbai, India
Kulkarni, P., & Venkataraman, C. (2000) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00312-x · Cited by 285
Wang, C., Wu, S., Zhou, S., Wang, H., Li, B., Chen, H., Yu, Y., & Shi, Y. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.025 · Cited by 277
Bi, X., Sheng, G., Peng, P., Chen, Y., & Fu, J. (2005) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.052 · Cited by 135
Harrison, R. M., Jones, A. M., & Lawrence, R. G. (2003) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.025 · Cited by 136
Self-citationSun, S., Jia, L., Li, B., Yuan, A., Kong, L., Qi, H., Ma, W., Zhang, A., & Wu, Y. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.029 · Cited by 80
Jung, K. H., Liu, B., Lovinsky-Desir, S., Yan, B., Camann, D., Sjodin, A., Li, Z., Perera, F., Kinney, P., Chillrud, S., et al. (2014) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.017 · Cited by 58
Wang, C., Zhou, S., Wu, S., Tang, J., Li, H., & Du, J. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125764 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, R. M., Smith, D. J. T., & Luhana, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 825-832
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2074579424
- Cited by
- 1,296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.