Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Production of the Hydroxyl Radical in Indoor Air

Weschler, Charles J., Shields, Helen C.·1996·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Certain alkenes known to have significant indoor concentrations react with O 3 at rates that are comparable to or faster than typical air exchange rates in commercial and residential buildings; these reac tions produce the hydroxyl radical (OH) in meaningful yields. The present study uses a one-compartment mass balance model to investigate the indoor production of OH as a consequence of such chemistry. Important sources for indoor OH include the reactions of O 3 with d -limonene, α-terpinene, 2-methyl-2-butene, and α-pinene, while important sinks include the reaction of indoor OH with d -limonene, nitrogen dioxide, ethanol, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, and isoprene. The modeling indicates that the OH sources and sinks equilibrate in tens of mil liseconds, an interval much shorter than the residence time for a parcel of indoor air. Indoor O 3 drives the production of OH, which scales nonlinearly with the concentration of O 3 . At 20 ppb indoor O 3, using average indoor concentrations for key reactants, the model predicts a steady-state indoor OH concentra tion of 6.7 × 10 - 6 ppb (1.7 × 10 5 molecules/cm 3 ). This is smaller than a typical midday outdoor OH concentration of 2 × 10 -4 ppb (5 × 10 6 molecules/cm 3 ) but larger than measured nighttime outdoor levels. The OH radical at 6.7 × 10 - 6 ppb will oxidize saturated organics 2−5 orders of magnitude faster than O 3 at 20 ppb. In many cases, the expected oxidation products are more irritating and corrosive than their precursors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es960032f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Weschler, C. J., & Shields, H. C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
3250-3258
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2027469276
Cited by
208
References
0
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.