The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantification of the Dilute Sedimentary Soot Phase: Implications for PAH Speciation and Bioavailability
Abstract
Existing field data indicate that soot may significantly affect the environmental speciation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). To expand hydrophobic partition models to include soot partitioning, we need to quantify f sc, the soot fraction of the solid matrix, and K sc, the soot-carbon-normalized partition coefficient. To this end, we have developed a method that allows quantification of soot carbon in dilute and complex sedimentary matrices. Non-soot organic carbon is removed by thermal oxidation, and inorganic carbonates are removed by acidification, fol lowed by CHN elemental analysis of the residual soot carbon. The selectivity of the soot carbon method was confirmed in tests with matrices of known compostion. The soot quantification technique was applied to two sets of natural sediments, both previously analyzed for PAHs. The input histories of PAHs and soot recorded in a lacustrine sediment core followed the same general trends, and we thus infer a coupling between the two. Our measures of f sc and calculations of K sc, approximated from studies of PAH sorption onto activated carbon, were applied to rationalize previously generated in situ K oc values. Intriguingly, we find that the elevated PAH K d values of two marine sediment−porewater systems are now quantitatively explain able through the extended, soot-partioning inclusive, distribution model. The importance of the soot phase for PAHs in the environment has implications for how we perceive (and should test) in situ bioavailability and, consequently, also for the development of sediment quality criteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review
van der Oost, R., Beyer, J., & Vermeulen, N. P. E. (2003) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s1382-6689(02)00126-6 · Cited by 4,895
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J., & Rondon, M. (2006) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5 · Cited by 3,053
Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O'Neill, B., Skjemstad, J. O., Thies, J., Luizão, F. J., Petersen, J., et al. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0383 · Cited by 2,191
(2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/472 · Cited by 851
Trophic magnification factors: Considerations of ecology, ecosystems, and study design
Borgå, K., Kidd, K. A., Muir, D. C., Berglund, O., Conder, J. M., Gobas, F. A., Kucklick, J., Malm, O., & Powell, D. E. (2012) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.244 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustafsson, Ö., Haghseta, F., Chan, C., MacFarlane, J., & Gschwend, P. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-12-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 203-209
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1973261197
- Cited by
- 927
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of the Dilute Sedimentary Soot Phase: Implications for PAH Speciation and Bioavailability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es960317s
- The paper
- Gustafsson, Ö., Haghseta, F., Chan, C., MacFarlane, J., & Gschwend, P. M. (1997). Quantification of the Dilute Sedimentary Soot Phase: Implications for PAH Speciation and Bioavailability. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960317s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.