The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transformation of TNT by Aquatic Plants and Plant Tissue Cultures
Abstract
The ability of plants to uptake and transform 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) was investigated using the aquatic plant Myriophyllum spicatum, axenic Myriophyllum aquaticum, and Catharanthus roseus hairy root cultures. Studies demonstrate that Myriophyllum, with or without its periphyton, and C. roseus transform TNT. Low concentrations of aminated nitrotoluenes (2-amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene and 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene) were observed in the extracellular medium and tissue extracts. Primary products of transformation were not identified, and mineralization was not observed. Mass balances demonstrate that a large percentage of the unknown TNT transformation products were associated with the plant. This fraction could be at least partially recovered from the plant tissue with methanol extraction. A soluble fraction was also present in the medium. The absence of periphyton had little impact on the results observed. Medium concentrations of 4-amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene were greater in systems in which the periphyton was not removed. For the first time, the intrinsic ability of plants to transform TNT has been confirmed. The formation of soluble, uncharacterized transformation products is a concern for potential phytoremediation applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Salt, D. E., Smith, R. D., & Raskin, I. (1998) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.643 · Cited by 2,085
Kadlec, R. H., & Wallace, S. (2008) · doi:10.1201/9781420012514 · Cited by 1,009
Phytoremediation: An ecological solution to organic chemical contamination
Susarla, S., Medina, V. F., & McCutcheon, S. C. (2002) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(02)00026-5 · Cited by 784
Phytoremediation—A Novel and Promising Approach for Environmental Clean-up
Suresh, B., & Ravishankar, G. A. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388550490493627 · Cited by 419
Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics
Abhilash, P. C., Jamil, S., & Singh, N. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.04.002 · Cited by 353
Doty, S. L., Shang, T. Q., Wilson, A. M., Tangen, J., Westergreen, A. D., Newman, L. A., Strand, S. E., & Gordon, M. P. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.12.6287 · Cited by 269
Phytoremediation: An Alternative Tool Towards Clean and Green Environment
Misra, S., & Misra, K. G. (2019) · Sustainable Green Technologies for Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2772-8_5 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, J. B., Shanks, J., Vanderford, M., Lauritzen, J., & Bhadra, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-12-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 266-271
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2085220538
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.