The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils: Role of Synthetic Chelates in Lead Phytoextraction
Abstract
Lead phytoextraction, using plants to extract Pb from contaminated soils, is an emerging technology. Calculations of soil Pb mass balance suggest that this technology will be economically feasible only if systems can be developed to employ high biomass plants that can accumulate greater than 1% Pb in their shoots. In this study, we investigated the potential of adding chelates to Pb-contaminated soils to increase Pb accumulation in plants. The addition of chelates to a Pb-contaminated soil (total soil Pb 2500 mg kg - 1 ) increased shoot Pb concentrations of corn ( Zea mays L. cv. Fiesta) and pea ( Pisum sativum L. cv. Sparkle) from less than 500 mg kg - 1 to more than 10000 mg kg - 1 . The surge of Pb accumulation in these plants was associated with the surge of Pb level in the soil solution due to the addition of chelates to the soil. For the chelates tested, the order of the effectiveness in increasing Pb desorption from the soil was EDTA > HEDTA > DTPA > EGTA >EDDHA. We also found that EDTA significantly increased Pb translocation from roots to shoots. Within 24 h after applying EDTA solution [1.0 g of EDTA (kg soil) - 1 ] to the contaminated soil, Pb concentration in the corn xylem sap increased 140-fold, and net Pb translocation from roots to shoots increased 120-fold as compared to the control (no EDTA). These results indicate that chelates enhanced Pb desorption from soil to soil solution, facilitated Pb transport into the xylem, and increased Pb translocation from roots to shoots. Results from this study suggest that with careful management, chelate-assisted Pb phytoextraction may provide a cost-effective soil decontamination strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Self-citation
Cited by
Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
Vardhan, K. H., Kumar, P. S., & Panda, R. C. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197 · Cited by 1,618
Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils
Wong, M. H. (2003) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00232-1 · Cited by 1,059
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Lead toxicity in plants: Impacts and remediation
Zulfiqar, U., Farooq, M., Hussain, S., Maqsood, M., Hussain, M., Ishfaq, M., Ahmad, M., & Anjum, M. Z. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109557 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J. W., Chen, J., Berti, W. R., & Cunningham, S. D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-02-27
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 800-805
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2027997630
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.