Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 997

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoremediation of Lead-Contaminated Soils: Role of Synthetic Chelates in Lead Phytoextraction

Huang, Jianwei W., Chen, Jianjun, Berti, William R., Cunningham, Scott D.·1997·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Lead phytoextraction, using plants to extract Pb from contaminated soils, is an emerging technology. Calculations of soil Pb mass balance suggest that this technology will be economically feasible only if systems can be developed to employ high biomass plants that can accumulate greater than 1% Pb in their shoots. In this study, we investigated the potential of adding chelates to Pb-contaminated soils to increase Pb accumulation in plants. The addition of chelates to a Pb-contaminated soil (total soil Pb 2500 mg kg - 1 ) increased shoot Pb concentrations of corn ( Zea mays L. cv. Fiesta) and pea ( Pisum sativum L. cv. Sparkle) from less than 500 mg kg - 1 to more than 10000 mg kg - 1 . The surge of Pb accumulation in these plants was associated with the surge of Pb level in the soil solution due to the addition of chelates to the soil. For the chelates tested, the order of the effectiveness in increasing Pb desorption from the soil was EDTA > HEDTA > DTPA > EGTA >EDDHA. We also found that EDTA significantly increased Pb translocation from roots to shoots. Within 24 h after applying EDTA solution [1.0 g of EDTA (kg soil) - 1 ] to the contaminated soil, Pb concentration in the corn xylem sap increased 140-fold, and net Pb translocation from roots to shoots increased 120-fold as compared to the control (no EDTA). These results indicate that chelates enhanced Pb desorption from soil to soil solution, facilitated Pb transport into the xylem, and increased Pb translocation from roots to shoots. Results from this study suggest that with careful management, chelate-assisted Pb phytoextraction may provide a cost-effective soil decontamination strategy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es9604828

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 997

Metadata

Authors
Huang, J. W., Chen, J., Berti, W. R., & Cunningham, S. D.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1997-02-27
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
800-805
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2027997630
Cited by
997
References
1
FWCI
27.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.