The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization of Ultrasonic Irradiation as an Advanced Oxidation Technology
Abstract
The optimization of ultrasonic irradiation as an advanced oxidation technology can be achieved by adjusting the ultrasonic frequency and saturating gas during sonolysis. The sonolytic production of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and hydroxyl radical ( • OH) has been investigated at the ultrasonic frequencies of 20, 40, 80, and 500 kHz, respectively, in the presence of four different saturating gases (i.e., Kr, Ar, He, O 2 ) at each frequency. H 2 O 2 was measured with a KI dosimeter, and the formation of • OH was monitored by trapping with terephthalic acid. Both the applied frequency and the physicochemical properties of the saturating gases influ ence the sonochemical rates of production of • OH and H 2 O 2 . At 20 kHz, the rate contants for the production of H 2 O 2 vary over an order of magnitude as a function of the nature of the dissolved gas (0.0508 and 1.31 μM min - 1 ). Similar trends are observed for the production of • OH at the same frequencies and under an identical set of saturating gases. The highest rates of production of H 2 O 2 (pH 7, 2.94 μM min - 1 ) and • OH (pH 11, 0.391 μM min - 1 ) are observed during sonolysis of Kr-saturated solutions at 500 kHz. Sonolysis of He-saturated solutions at 20 kHz results in the lowest rates of production of H 2 O 2 (0.0508 μM min - 1 ) and • OH (0.0310 μM min - 1 ). Decreasing differences among the saturating gases at higher frequencies are attributed to changes in bubble dynamics and thermodynamics as the resonant bubble radius decreases from 177 μm at 20 kHz to 7 μm at 500 kHz.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis
Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00033a004 · Cited by 18,495
Self-citationBuxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Cited by
Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2004) · Advances in Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(03)00032-7 · Cited by 1,737
Sonochemistry: Environmental Science and Engineering Applications
Adewuyi, Y. G. (2001) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie010096l · Cited by 1,049
Degradation of dyes from aqueous solution by Fenton processes: a review
Nidheesh, P. V., Gandhimathi, R., & Ramesh, S. T. (2013) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1385-z · Cited by 696
Chowdhury, P., & Viraraghavan, T. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.031 · Cited by 319
HYDRODYNAMIC CAVITATION REACTORS: A STATE OF THE ART REVIEW
Gogate, P. R., & Pandit, A. B. (2001) · Reviews in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1515/revce.2001.17.1.1 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Hua, I., & Hoffmann, M. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-07-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2237-2243
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1973326873
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of Ultrasonic Irradiation as an Advanced Oxidation Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es960717f
- The paper
- Hua, I., & Hoffmann, M. R. (1997). Optimization of Ultrasonic Irradiation as an Advanced Oxidation Technology. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960717f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.