The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioaccessibility of Metals in Soils for Different Liquid to Solid Ratios in Synthetic Gastric Fluid
Abstract
The bioaccessible fraction of metals in the stomach has been estimated for two soil materials using laboratory synthesized gastric juice. Heavy metals present in each soil matrix were extracted and measured, as a technique to simulate metal solubilization processes that occur in the human stomach. The results from the synthetic gastric juice extraction were compared to values obtained using a modified EPA concentrated acid extraction procedure, method 3051, on the same soils. The experiments evaluated the effect of varying the liquid to solid ratio on gastric juice extraction efficiency for arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb). Soil samples employed were a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard soil (Montana SRM 2710) and a composite hazardous waste contaminated soil from Jersey City, NJ. The current work demonstrates that bioaccessibility is not the same for each metal within a given soil, nor between the soils. Estimates of the bioaccessible fraction of the metals studied ranged from 2 to 61% of the NIST certified values for Montana soil, and from 3% to 58% of EPA method 3051 values in contaminated Jersey City soil. The experiments indicated that the bioaccessibility of metals in the soils extracted by the in vitro synthetic gastric juice will only be affected slightly by changes in gastric fluid liquid to solid ratios for the range 100:1 to 5000:1 (mL/g). Further, the masses of each soil (0.05 or 0.5 g) used did not affect the bioaccessibility at the 1000:1 ratio.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparison of Five In Vitro Digestion Models To Study the Bioaccessibility of Soil Contaminants
Oomen, A. G., Hack, A., Minekus, M., Zeijdner, E., Cornelis, C., Schoeters, G., Verstraete, W., Van de Wiele, T., Wragg, J., Rompelberg, C. J. M., et al. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es010204v · Cited by 800
Bioavailability and Risk Assessment of Orally Ingested Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Ramesh, A., Walker, S. A., Hood, D. B., Guillén, M. D., Schneider, K., & Weyand, E. H. (2004) · International Journal of Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10915810490517063 · Cited by 498
Neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to the environmental metals Mn, Pb, and Hg
Charlet, L., Chapron, Y., Faller, P., Kirsch, R., Stone, A. T., & Baveye, P. C. (2012) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.012 · Cited by 92
Adamo, P., Agrelli, D., & Zampella, M. (2018) · Environmental Geochemistry: Site Characterization, Data Analysis and Case Histories · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63763-5.00010-0 · Cited by 55
Shock, S. S., Bessinger, B. A., Lowney, Y. W., & Clark, J. L. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0703574 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamel, S. C., Buckley, B., & Lioy, P. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 358-362
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1964005676
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioaccessibility of Metals in Soils for Different Liquid to Solid Ratios in Synthetic Gastric Fluid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es9701422
- The paper
- Hamel, S. C., Buckley, B., & Lioy, P. J. (1998). Bioaccessibility of Metals in Soils for Different Liquid to Solid Ratios in Synthetic Gastric Fluid. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9701422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.