The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Organic Compounds Emitted from Motor Vehicle Traffic in a Los Angeles Roadway Tunnel
Abstract
The emission rates for 221 vapor-phase, semivolatile, and particle-phase organic compounds from motor vehicles plus fine particulate matter mass and some inorganic particle-phase species are calculated based on measurements made inside and outside a Los Angeles roadway tunnel in 1993. These emission rates are calculated based on fuel consumption to remove any uncertainties based on tunnel dilution rates or air circulation. The results show carbon monoxide emissions rates of 130 g L -1 of gasoline-equivalent fuel burned and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions of 9.1 g L - 1 . These values are higher than predicted by the baseline version of California's EMFAC 7G emissions inventory program but are within the coemission rate range of 108 ± 25 g L -1 reported by roadside remote sensing studies in Los Angeles [Singer, B. C.; Harley, R. A. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1996, 46, 581−593]. When the VOC emissions composition in the tunnel is compared to that of tailpipe emissions source test data and to the composition of additional unburned whole gasoline, the tunnel atmosphere is found to be consistent with a linear combination of these major contributors over a fairly broad range of about 74−97% vehicle exhaust depending on the tailpipe profiles used. Fine particulate emissions within the tunnel consist largely of carbonaceous material accompanied by a significant amount of ammonium nitrate apparently formed by gas-to-particle conversion processes within the tunnel atmosphere. Certain gas-phase and particulate organic compounds traditionally thought to be the secondary products of atmospheric chemical reactions are enriched inside the tunnel, and from this enrichment, the primary emission rates of aromatic alcohols, aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, and aromatic polycarboxylic acids are calculated. Data on petroleum biomarkers emissions rates in the tunnel can be used in the future to estimate primary vehicle exhaust fine particulate matter concentrations in the urban atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomass burning - A review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion
Simoneit, B. R. T. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(01)00061-0 · Cited by 1,389
Self-citationEmissions of Metals Associated with Motor Vehicle Roadways
Lough, G. C., Schauer, J. J., Park, J.-S., Shafer, M. M., DeMinter, J. T., & Weinstein, J. P. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es048715f · Cited by 802
Bi, X., Sheng, G., Peng, P., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., & Fu, J. (2003) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00832-4 · Cited by 301
Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment
Watson, J. G., Zhu, T., Chow, J. C., Engelbrecht, J., Fujita, E. M., & Wilson, W. E. (2002) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00243-6 · Cited by 299
Feng, J., Chan, C. K., Fang, M., Hu, M., He, L., & Tang, X. (2005) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.067 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, M. P., Cass, G. R., & Simoneit, B. R. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-06-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2051-2060
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2075424611
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.