The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacterial Methylmercury Degradation in Florida Everglades Peat Sediment
Abstract
Methylmercury (MeHg) degradation was investigated along an eutrophication gradient in the Florida Everglades by quantifying 14 CH 4 and 14 CO 2 production after incubation of anaerobic sediments with [ 14 C]MeHg. Degradation rate constants ( k ) were consistently ≤0.1 d - 1 and decreased with sediment depth. Higher k values were observed when shorter incubation times and lower MeHg amendment levels were used, and k increased 2-fold as in-situ MeHg concentrations were approached. The average floc layer k was 0.046 ± 0.023 d - 1 ( n = 17) for 1−2 day incubations. In-situ degradation rates were estimated to be 0.02−0.5 ng of MeHg (g of dry sediment) - 1 d - 1, increasing from eutrophied to pristine areas. Nitrate-respiring bacteria did not demethylate MeHg, and NO 3 - addition partially inhibited degradation in some cases. MeHg degradation rates were not affected by PO 4 3 - addition. 14 CO 2 production in all samples indicated that oxidative demethylation (OD) was an important degradation mechanism. OD occurred over 5 orders of magnitude of applied MeHg concentration, with lowest limits [1−18 ng of MeHg (g of dry sediment) - 1 ] in the range of in-situ MeHg levels. Sulfate reducers and methanogens were the primary agents of anaerobic OD, although it is suggested that methanogens dominate degradation at in-situ MeHg concentrations. Specific pathways of OD by these two microbial groups are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems
Barkay, T., Miller, S. M., & Summers, A. O. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00046-9 · Cited by 1,054
Methanogens: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Lake Periphyton
Hamelin, S., Amyot, M., Barkay, T., Wang, Y., & Planas, D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2010072 · Cited by 308
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Moreno, C. E., Fjeld, E., & Lydersen, E. (2016) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-016-5148-z · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Marvin-DiPasquale, M. C., & Oremland, R. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2556-2563
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1973402109
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Methylmercury Degradation in Florida Everglades Peat Sediment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es971099l
- The paper
- Marvin-DiPasquale, M. C., & Oremland, R. S. (1998). Bacterial Methylmercury Degradation in Florida Everglades Peat Sediment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es971099l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.