The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phytoremediation on the Brink of Commericialization
Abstract
Plants ranging from pennycress to poplar trees are proving their worth as cleanup tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vardhan, K. H., Kumar, P. S., & Panda, R. C. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197 · Cited by 1,618
Emerging contaminants: A One Health perspective
Wang, F., Xiang, L., Sze-Yin Leung, K., Elsner, M., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Pan, B., Sun, H., An, T., Ying, G., et al. (2024) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100612 · Cited by 639
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals
Yao, Z., Li, J., Xie, H., & Yu, C. (2012) · Procedia Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.099 · Cited by 486
Heavy metals and soil microbes
Abdu, N., Abdullahi, A. A., & Abdulkadir, A. (2017) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-016-0587-x · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, M. E.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 182A-186A
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2318985698
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoremediation on the Brink of Commericialization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es972219s
- The paper
- Watanabe, M. E. (1997). Phytoremediation on the Brink of Commericialization. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es972219s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
