The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling the Production of and Competition for Hydrogen in a Dechlorinating Culture
Abstract
A comprehensive biokinetic model employing Michaelis−Menten-type kinetics, H 2 thresholds, and thermodynamic limitations on donor fermentation was used to describe both fermentation of electron donors and competition for the evolved H 2 between hydrogenotrophic tetrachloroethene dechlorinators and methanogens. Model simulations compared favorably to experimental data where delivery of H 2 to a tetrachloroethene dechlorinator was accomplished using the donors butyric acid, ethanol, lactic acid, and propionic acid. Fermentations of the different donors were characterized by different dynamic patterns of H 2 generation that were captured successfully by the model. Experimental data and model simulations show that the ability to use H 2 at appreciable rates at low levels provides a competitive advantage to dechlorinators over methanogens. Slowly fermented substrates producing lower H 2 levels—kinetically accessible to dechlorinators, but too low for significant use by methanogenic competitors—were more effective and persistent “selective” stimulators of dechlorination than rapidly fermented substrates producing higher H 2 levels—accessible to both dechlorinators and methanogens. Model simulations suggest that adding excessive levels of rapidly fermented, high H 2 -level-generating donors in an attempt to overcome competition, instead results in a dominant methanogen population and an eventual failure of dechlorination. When stimulating dechlorination, the quality of the donor as well as the quantity added must be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological Hydrogen Production Measured in Batch Anaerobic Respirometers
Logan, B. E., Oh, S.-E., Kim, I. S., & Van Ginkel, S. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es015783i · Cited by 542
Anaerobic Microbial Dehalogenation
Smidt, H., & de Vos, W. M. (2004) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.58.030603.123600 · Cited by 434
Hug, L. A., Beiko, R. G., Rowe, A. R., Richardson, R. E., & Edwards, E. A. (2012) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-327 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Fennell, D. E., & Gossett, J. M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-07-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2450-2460
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2008875588
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the Production of and Competition for Hydrogen in a Dechlorinating Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es980136l
- The paper
- Fennell, D. E., & Gossett, J. M. (1998). Modeling the Production of and Competition for Hydrogen in a Dechlorinating Culture. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980136l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.