The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantification of Polymer Interactions in Bacterial Adhesion
Abstract
Adhesion of bacteria to solids is governed by van der Waals, electrostatic, and acid−base (hydrophobic) interactions, which are combined in an extended DLVO model (DLVO−AB) and by interactions of bacterial surface polymers with the solid surfaces. A method to calculate polymer interactions was not available yet, and their existence had been inferred only qualitatively from the deviation of the actual adhesion from DLVO−AB-based expectations. Here, we present attempts (i) to quantify polymer interactions from this deviation and (ii) to calculate them independently as the sum of repulsive and attractive contributions. Repulsion was assumed to result from the resistance of the polymer layer against compression. Its calculation was most sensitive to the packing density of the polymers in the cell envelope. Attraction was assumed to origin from polymer adsorption to the surface and was calculated on the basis of adsorption data of isolated surface polymers. Comparison of total interaction energy curves with adhesion of six Gram-negative bacteria to glass showed that the low adherence of five strains may have resulted from dominant polymer repulsion, i.e., hardly compressible cell envelopes hindered the bacteria to approach the energy minima resulting from DLVO−AB interactions. One strain adhered readily, possibly because polymer repulsion was low and polymer attraction and DLVO−AB forces dominated the overall interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review
Kong, M., Chen, X. G., Xing, K., & Park, H. J. (2010) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012 · Cited by 3,037
Bacterial Adhesion and Transport in Porous Media: Role of the Secondary Energy Minimum
Redman, J. A., Walker, S. L., & Elimelech, M. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034887l · Cited by 532
Electric double layer interactions in bacterial adhesion to surfaces
Poortinga, A. T., Bos, R., Norde, W., & Busscher, H. J. (2002) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00032-8 · Cited by 485
Quantification of bacterial adhesion forces using atomic force microscopy (AFM)
Fang, H. H. P., Chan, K.-Y., & Xu, L.-C. (2000) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00137-2 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Jucker, B. A., Zehnder, A. J. B., & Harms, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-08-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2909-2915
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2125955445
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Polymer Interactions in Bacterial Adhesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es980211s
- The paper
- Jucker, B. A., Zehnder, A. J. B., & Harms, H. (1998). Quantification of Polymer Interactions in Bacterial Adhesion. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980211s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.