The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Framework for the Interpretation of Measurements of SOCs in Plants
Abstract
Plant uptake of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) occurs primarily from the atmosphere via one of three processes: equilibrium partitioning between the vegetation and the gas phase, kinetically limited gaseous deposition, or wet and dry particle-bound deposition. Each of these processes depends on different atmospheric concentrations, plant properties, and environmental variables. Hence, in interpreting measurements of SOCs in plants, it is imperative that the major process responsible for the accumulation of a given compound be known. Beginning with basic equations describing gaseous and particle-bound deposition to vegetation, a framework for identifying the major uptake process and further interpreting measurements of plant concentrations is developed. This framework makes use of the relative differences in accumulation behavior as a function of the octanol−air partition coefficient ( K OA ) of the chemical. The mathematical analysis leads to two interpretive tools, both log−log plots, one of the quotient of the vegetation and gas-phase concentrations vs K OA and one of the quotient of the vegetation and particle-bound concentrations vs the quotient of the particle-bound and gaseous concentrations. Each of these plots contains three distinct and easily recognizable segments, and each segment corresponds to one of the three deposition processes. When the experimental data are plotted and the three segments are identified, it is possible to determine the dominant uptake process for a given compound, and this in turn opens the door to further interpretation of the plant uptake behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Keyte, I. J., Harrison, R. M., & Lammel, G. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60147a · Cited by 758
Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminant plumes
Christensen, T. H., Bjerg, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Jakobsen, R., Heron, G., & Albrechtsen, H.-J. (2000) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0169-7722(00)00109-1 · Cited by 518
Tian, Y., Yao, Y., Chang, S., Zhao, Z., Zhao, Y., Yuan, X., Wu, F., & Sun, H. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b05385 · Cited by 223
Pi, N., Ng, J. Z., & Kelly, B. C. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.003 · Cited by 118
Yamazaki, E., Eun, H., Taniyasu, S., Sakamoto, T., Hanari, N., Inui, H., Wu, R., Lin, H., Lam, P. K. S., Falandysz, J., et al. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c08767 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- McLachlan, M. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1799-1804
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1985941042
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framework for the Interpretation of Measurements of SOCs in Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es980831t
- The paper
- McLachlan, M. S. (1999). Framework for the Interpretation of Measurements of SOCs in Plants. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980831t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.