The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uptake of Airborne Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Agricultural Plants: Field Measurements of Interspecies Variability
Abstract
The accumulation of semivolatile organic compounds (SOCs) in plants is important because plants are the major vector of these compounds into terrestrial food chains and because plants play an important role in scavenging SOCs from the atmosphere and transferring them to the soil. Agricultural plants are of particular interest because they are a key link in the atmosphere−fodder−milk/beef food chain that accounts for much of background human exposure to persistent lipophilic organic pollutants such as PCBs and PCDD/Fs. In this study the accumulation of PCBs, PCDD/Fs, PAHs, and some chlorobenzenes was determined in eight grassland species as well as maize and sunflower leaves collected simultaneously at a semirural site in Central Europe. Air samples were collected at the same site during the growth of these plants, and the particle-bound and gaseous concentrations were determined. A newly developed interpretive framework was employed to analyze the data, and it was established whether the accumulation of a given compound was due primarily to equilibrium partitioning, kinetically limited gaseous deposition, or particle-bound deposition. The interspecies variability in uptake was then examined, and it was found that for those compounds which had accumulated primarily via kinetically limited gaseous deposition and particle-bound deposition the variation among the 10 species was generally a factor of <4. For most of the plants this variation could largely be explained by differences in the surface area and horizontally projected surface area per unit plant volume. However, for the more volatile compounds for which the plant levels were determined by equilibrium partitioning, the interspecies variability exceeded a factor of 30. This variability was not related to the extractable lipid content or the cuticle volume fraction in the vegetation. Good agreement was found between the partition coefficients measured in the field and published values measured in the laboratory. The results indicate that the interspecies variability in the vegetation/gas-phase partition coefficient is larger than the variability in the net gaseous and particle-bound deposition velocities, yielding a greater interspecies variability in plant levels for more volatile SOCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Keyte, I. J., Harrison, R. M., & Lammel, G. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60147a · Cited by 758
Yamazaki, E., Eun, H., Taniyasu, S., Sakamoto, T., Hanari, N., Inui, H., Wu, R., Lin, H., Lam, P. K. S., Falandysz, J., et al. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c08767 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Böhme, F., Welsch-Pausch, K., & McLachlan, M. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-15
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1805-1813
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2079869989
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake of Airborne Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Agricultural Plants: Field Measurements of Interspecies Variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es980832l
- The paper
- Böhme, F., Welsch-Pausch, K., & McLachlan, M. S. (1999). Uptake of Airborne Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Agricultural Plants: Field Measurements of Interspecies Variability. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980832l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.