Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Composition of Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter in the Denver, Colorado Area

Cadle, Steven H., Mulawa, Patricia A., Hunsanger, Eric C., Nelson, Ken, Ragazzi, Ronald A., Barrett, Richard, Gallagher, Gerald L., Lawson, Douglas R., Knapp, Kenneth T., Snow, Richard·1999·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

A study to characterize particulate matter emissions from 195 in-use gasoline and diesel passenger vehicles was conducted during the summer of 1996 and the winter of 1997 in the Denver, Colorado region. Vehicles were tested as received on chassis dynamometers using the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS). Both PM-10 and regulated emissions were measured for each phase of the UDDS. Approximately 88% of the PM-10 collected was carbonaceous material, of which the average organic fraction was 0.7 for gasoline vehicles and 0.4 for diesel vehicles. This suggests that the organic carbon (OC) to elemental carbon (EC) split may be useful in separating light-duty gasoline from diesel PM emissions. Sulfate emission rates averaged 0.45 and 3.51 mg/mi for gasoline and diesel vehicles, indicating that the EPA's mobile emissions model overpredicts sulfate emission rates. Elements identified by X-ray fluorescence averaged between 3 and 9% of the PM-10 mass. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) profiles developed may help distinguish between gasoline and diesel vehicles in source apportion ment studies. Total PAH emissions, however, were not a good candidate as a tracer of gasoline PM emissions. Hopane and sterane emissions were very similar across the fleet and may be useful tracers for mobile source PM emissions. Overall, emission rates varied significantly with vehicle classification and driving condition, suggesting that a single profile representing the entire fleet will need to carefully reflect the local fleet composition and the local weighting of cold, hot, and hot-stabilized emissions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es9810843

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Cadle, S. H., Mulawa, P. A., Hunsanger, E. C., Nelson, K., Ragazzi, R. A., Barrett, R., Gallagher, G. L., Lawson, D. R., Knapp, K. T., & Snow, R.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1999-05-29
Volume
33
Issue
14
Pages
2328-2339
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W1964414258
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
16.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Composition of Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter in the Denver, Colorado Area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es9810843
The paper
Cadle, S. H., Mulawa, P. A., Hunsanger, E. C., Nelson, K., Ragazzi, R. A., Barrett, R., Gallagher, G. L., Lawson, D. R., Knapp, K. T., & Snow, R. (1999). Composition of Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Exhaust Particulate Matter in the Denver, Colorado Area. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9810843

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.