The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metal Removal from Contaminated Soil and Sediments by the Biosurfactant Surfactin
Abstract
Batch soil washing experiments were performed to evaluate the feasibility of using surfactin from Bacillus subtilis, a lipopeptide biosurfactant, for the removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil and sediments. The soil contained high levels of metals and hydrocarbons (890 mg/kg of zinc, 420 mg/kg of copper, and 12.6% oil and grease), and the sediments contained 110 mg/kg of copper and 3300 mg/kg of zinc. The contaminated soil was spiked to increase the levels of copper, zinc, and cadmium to 550, 1200, and 2000 mg/kg, respectively. Water alone removed minimal amounts of copper and zinc (less than 1%). Results showed that 0.25% surfactin/1% NaOH could remove 25% of the copper and 6% of the zinc from the soil and 15% of the copper and 6% of the zinc from the sediments. A series of five washings of the soil with 0.25% surfactin (1% NaOH) was able to remove 70% of the copper and 22% of the zinc. The technique of ultrafiltration and the measurement of octanol−water partitioning and ζ-potential were used to determine the mechanism of metal removal by surfactin. It was indicated that surfactin was able to remove the metals by sorption at the soil interphase and metal complexation, followed by desorption of the metal through interfacial tension lowering and fluid forces and finally complexation of the metal with the micelles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental applications for biosurfactants
Mulligan, C. N. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.009 · Cited by 1,537
Self-citationA critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater
Xia, S., Song, Z., Jeyakumar, P., Shaheen, S. M., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., Bolan, N., & Wang, H. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526 · Cited by 490
Lebeau, T., Braud, A., & Jézéquel, K. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.09.015 · Cited by 383
Fenibo, E. O., Ijoma, G. N., Selvarajan, R., & Chikere, C. B. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7110581 · Cited by 284
Use of Surfactant-Modified Zeolites and Clays for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Water
Jiménez-Castañeda, M., & Medina, D. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9040235 · Cited by 122
Green and efficient removal of cadmium from rice flour using natural deep eutectic solvents
Huang, Y., Feng, F., Chen, Z.-G., Wu, T., & Wang, Z.-H. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.060 · Cited by 73
Design, synthesis and valued properties of surfactin oversimplified analogues
Lima, T. A., Etchegaray, A., & Machini, M. T. (2020) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-019-02806-2 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulligan, C. N., Yong, R. N., Gibbs, B. F., James, S., & Bennett, H. P. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-09-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3812-3820
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1991922485
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.