The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorption of Phenol, p-Nitrophenol, and Aniline to Dual-Cation Organobentonites from Water
Abstract
A series of dual-cation organobentonites are synthesized by replacing the metal ions in bentonite with both long-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium cations, such as dodecyltrimethylammonium (DTMA), benzyldimethyltetradecylammonium (BDTDA), cetyltrimethylammonium (CTMA), octodecyltrimethylammonium (OTMA), and short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium cations, such as tetramethylammonium (TMA). The influential factors, mechanisms and characteristics of polar and ionizable organic contaminants, such as p -nitrophenol, phenol, and aniline, and sorption to dual-cation organobentonites from water are investigated systematically and described quantitatively. The sorption properties are affected by treatment conditions, such as pH, amount of organobentonite, and shaking time; structure of organobentonites, such as interlayer spacings and organic carbon contents; and the properties of organic compounds, such as solubility and octanol−water coefficient partition. Sorption isotherms of p -nitrophenol, phenol, and aniline are typically nonlinear. Both adsorption and partition contribute to the sorption of organic compounds to dual-cation organobentonites. The separate contributions of adsorption and partition to the total sorption of organic compounds to dual-cation organobentonites are analyzed mathematically, e.g., Q A = a ln C e + b − K oc · f oc · C e, Q P = K oc · f oc · C e . Results indicate that the partition effect is weak and linear to contaminant concentration, whereas adsorption effect is more powerful and nonlinear to contaminant concentration. The sorption of organic compounds to dual-cation organobentonite is dominated by adsorption at low concentrations and by partition at high concentrations, making the organobentonites powerful sorbents for organic contaminants over a wide range of concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adsorption of organic pollutants by natural and modified clays: A comprehensive review
Awad, A. M., Shaikh, S. M. R., Jalab, R., Gulied, M. H., Nasser, M. S., Benamor, A., & Adham, S. (2019) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115719 · Cited by 585
Paria, S., & Yuet, P. K. (2006) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a06-004 · Cited by 331
Hybrid materials based on clays for environmental and biomedical applications
Ruiz-Hitzky, E., Aranda, P., Darder, M., & Rytwo, G. (2010) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c0jm00432d · Cited by 325
Montmorillonite nanoclay as a multifaceted drug-delivery carrier: A review
Jayrajsinh, S., Shankar, G., Agrawal, Y. K., & Bakre, L. (2017) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2017.03.023 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, L., Chen, B., & Shen, X.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-12-21
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 468-475
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1971763749
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.