The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carboxylic Acids in Secondary Aerosols from Oxidation of Cyclic Monoterpenes by Ozone
Abstract
A series of smog chamber experiments have been conducted in which five cyclic monoterpenes were oxidized by ozone. The evolved secondary aerosol was analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC-MS for nonvolatile polar oxidation products with emphasis on the identification of carboxylic acids. Three classes of compounds were determined at concentration levels corresponding to low percentage molar yields: i.e. dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic acids, and hydroxyketocarboxylic acids. Carboxylic acids are highly polar and have lower vapor pressures than their corresponding aldehydes and may thus play an important role in secondary organic aerosol formation processes. The most abundant carboxylic acids were the following: cis -pinic acid AB1 ( cis -3-carboxy-2,2-dimethylcyclobutylethanoic acid) from α- and β-pinene; cis -pinonic acid A3 ( cis -3-acetyl-2,2-dimethylcyclobutylethanoic acid) and cis -10-hydroxypinonic acid AB6 ( cis -2,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxyacetylcyclobutylethanoic acid) from α-pinene and β-pinene; cis -3 - caric acid C1 ( cis -2,2-dimethyl-1,3-cyclopropyldiethanoic acid), cis -3-caronic acid C3 (2,2-dimethyl-3-(2-oxopropyl)cyclopropanylethanoic acid), and cis -10-hydroxy-3-caronic acid C6 ( cis -2,2-dimethyl-3-(hydroxy-2-oxopropyl)cyclopropanylethanoic acid) from 3-carene; cis -sabinic acid S1 ( cis -2-carboxy-1-isopropylcyclopropylethanoic acid) from sabinene; limonic acid L1 (3-isopropenylhexanedioic acid), limononic acid L3 (3-isopropenyl-6-oxo-heptanoic acid), 7-hydroxylimononic acid L6 (3-isopropenyl-7-hydroxy-6-oxoheptanoic acid), and 7-hydroxylimononic acid L6 ‘ (7-hydroxy-3-isopropenyl-6-oxoheptanoic acid) from limonene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review
Kanakidou, M., Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., Barnes, I., Dentener, F. J., Facchini, M. C., Van Dingenen, R., Ervens, B., Nenes, A., Nielsen, C. J., et al. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-1053-2005 · Cited by 3,244
Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., & Pilling, M. J. (2003) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-3-161-2003 · Cited by 1,637
Cleaning products and air fresheners: exposure to primary and secondary air pollutants
Nazaroff, W. W., & Weschler, C. J. (2004) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.040 · Cited by 846
Ozone in Indoor Environments: Concentration and Chemistry
WESCHLER, C. J. (2000) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0668.2000.010004269.x · Cited by 758
The Molecular Identification of Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere: State of the Art and Challenges
Nozière, B., Kalberer, M., Claeys, M., Allan, J., D’Anna, B., Decesari, S., Finessi, E., Glasius, M., Grgić, I., Hamilton, J. F., et al. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003485 · Cited by 656
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Glasius, M., Lahaniati, M., Calogirou, A., Di Bella, D., Jensen, N. R., Hjorth, J., Kotzias, D., & Larsen, B. R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-02-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1001-1010
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1990726653
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carboxylic Acids in Secondary Aerosols from Oxidation of Cyclic Monoterpenes by Ozone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es990445r
- The paper
- Glasius, M., Lahaniati, M., Calogirou, A., Di Bella, D., Jensen, N. R., Hjorth, J., Kotzias, D., & Larsen, B. R. (2000). Carboxylic Acids in Secondary Aerosols from Oxidation of Cyclic Monoterpenes by Ozone. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990445r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
