The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Limestone Reactor for Fluoride Removal from Wastewaters
Abstract
A two-column limestone reactor has been designed to reduce fluoride concentrations from wastewaters to below the maximum contaminant level (MCL limit) of 4 mg/L. The reactor functions by forcing calcite (CaCO 3 ) to dissolve and fluorite (CaF 2 ) to precipitate in the first column. The second column is not necessary to remove fluoride but is used to precipitate the calcite dissolved in the first column. This returns the treated water to its approximate initial composition. In laboratory experiments, the fluoride concentration of the effluent from feedwaters containing initial F amounts of up to 109 mg/L were brought below the MCL limit of 4 mg/L with a porewater residence time within the column of 2 h. Profile sampling shows that fluoride is reduced from 109 to 8 mg/L after only 35 min within the reactor. The major advantage of this potential technology over existing liming and ion exchange methods is that system monitoring is minimal, regular column regeneration is not required, and chemicals are not permanently added to the water. Because the CaCO 3 dissolved in the first column is precipitated in the second, the reactor has potential application to reduce the concentrations from wastewaters of contaminants similar in charge and size to Ca 2+ and CO 3 2- through coprecipitation reactions. In a pilot experiment where fly ash leachate was spiked with mg/L levels of Cd, As, Cr, and Se and directed through the reactor, reductions in all elements except Cr occurred. Cd was the most notable. Influent concentrations from 2 to 30 mg/L were reduced to below detection (<0.01 mg/L).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on the utilization of fly ash
Ahmaruzzaman, M. (2010) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003 · Cited by 2,641
Environmental-benign utilisation of fly ash as low-cost adsorbents
WANG, S., & WU, H. (2006) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.067 · Cited by 497
Electrochemical removal of fluoride ions from industrial wastewater
Shen, F., Chen, X., Gao, P., & Chen, G. (2003) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/s0009-2509(02)00639-5 · Cited by 458
Sources and toxicity of fluoride in the environment
Ghosh, A., Mukherjee, K., Ghosh, S. K., & Saha, B. (2013) · Research on Chemical Intermediates · doi:10.1007/s11164-012-0841-1 · Cited by 255
Basic oxygen furnace slag: Review of current and potential uses
Naidu, T. S., Sheridan, C. M., & van Dyk, L. D. (2020) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106234 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Reardon, E. J., & Wang, Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06-30
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3247-3253
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2021357530
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Limestone Reactor for Fluoride Removal from Wastewaters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es990542k
- The paper
- Reardon, E. J., & Wang, Y. (2000). A Limestone Reactor for Fluoride Removal from Wastewaters. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990542k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.