Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterizing Heterogeneous Bacterial Surface Functional Groups Using Discrete Affinity Spectra for Proton Binding

Cox, Jenny S., Smith, D. Scott, Warren, Lesley A., Ferris, F. Grant·1999·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Here we report results from a quantitative investigation of the types and densities of proton binding sites on a bacterial surface, Bacillus subtilis, from replicate acid−base titrations on bacteria at two ionic strengths (0.025 and 0.1 M). In contrast to the surface complexation modeling (SCM) approach developed and widely used for mineral, e.g., iron oxides, and more recently bacterial surfaces; we fit the data using the linear programming method (LPM). Our results using LPM indicate five discrete binding sites occurring on the surface of B. subtilis likely corresponding to carboxylic sites at low p K a values, phosphoric sites at near-neutral p K a values, and amine sites at high p K a values. Replicate titrations on subsamples from the same bacterial population indicated less variability than has been suggested for bacterial surfaces. Both the p K a and site density values were found to be dependent on ionic strength. Comparing the p K a values determined here with LPM for B. subtilis to those determined independently by using a fixed three site SCM model shows excellent agreement with the common sites likely corresponding to carboxylic, phosphoryl, and amine groups. However, the LPM approach identifies a further two sites as compared to the SCM approach. These results have an important implication. Surfaces of a given bacterial strain have a quantifiable, characteristic geochemical reactivity reflecting discrete sites that can be traced back in terms of function to the underlying, cell wall structure, a well-characterized phenomenon for most bacteria. However, an important caveat of our findings is that the absolute densities of these sites are highly dependent on a suite of both microbiological and system chemical parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es990627l

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Cox, J. S., Smith, D. S., Warren, L. A., & Ferris, F. G.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1999-11-04
Volume
33
Issue
24
Pages
4514-4521
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2005859799
Cited by
267
References
18
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterizing Heterogeneous Bacterial Surface Functional Groups Using Discrete Affinity Spectra for Proton Binding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es990627l
The paper
Cox, J. S., Smith, D. S., Warren, L. A., & Ferris, F. G. (1999). Characterizing Heterogeneous Bacterial Surface Functional Groups Using Discrete Affinity Spectra for Proton Binding. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990627l

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.