The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation Kinetics of Atrazine and Its Degradation Products with Ozone and OH Radicals: A Predictive Tool for Drinking Water Treatment
Open accessAbstract
The present study investigates the degradation of atrazine (2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-isopropylamino- s -triazine) by ozone and OH radicals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes, with the identification of the main degradation products. Besides the dealkylated and amide degradation products (6-amino-2-chloro-4-isopropylamino- s -triazine, 6-amino-2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)- s -triazine, 4-acetamido-2-chloro-6-isopropylamino- s -triazine, 4-acetamido-6-amino-2-chloro- s -triazine, and chlorodiamino- s -triazine), two new degradation products with an imine group were identified (2-chloro-4-ethylimino-6-isopropylamino- s -triazine and 6-amino-2-chloro-4-ethylimino- s -triazine). The contribution of the different pathways (direct ozone and OH radical reaction) to the overall degradation process has been quantified, and the rate constants of the reactions of atrazine and its main degradation products with both oxidants have been measured. The ethyl group is more reactive than the isopropyl group (i.e. 19 times during ozonation and four times during OH radical attack). The ethyl group reacts in higher proportion through oxidation to acetamide or imine derivates than to dealkylation. In contrast, the isopropyl group reacts mainly through dealkylation to the free amino group. Acetamido and imino groups are found to be resistant to chemical oxidation. These reactivities were corroborated by the measured values of the rate constants with both oxidants. A combination of product distribution and the kinetic parameters together with ozone and OH radical concentrations allowed us to calculate the evolution of the concentration of the degradation products for a given ozonation process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Cited by
Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review
Wacławek, S., Lutze, H. V., Grübel, K., Padil, V. V. T., Černík, M., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132 · Cited by 1,874
Oxidation of Pharmaceuticals during Ozonation and Advanced Oxidation Processes
Huber, M. M., Canonica, S., Park, G.-Y., & von Gunten, U. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es025896h · Cited by 1,615
Self-citationvon Gunten, U. (2003) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00458-x · Cited by 1,345
Self-citationSnyder, S. A., Westerhoff, P., Yoon, Y., & Sedlak, D. L. (2003) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/109287503768335931 · Cited by 930
Hollender, J., Zimmermann, S. G., Koepke, S., Krauss, M., McArdell, C. S., Ort, C., Singer, H., von Gunten, U., & Siegrist, H. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9014629 · Cited by 870
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Acero, J. L., Stemmler, K., & von Gunten, U.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-01-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 591-597
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1988907910
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.