Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reductive Dechlorination of Trichloroethene and Carbon Tetrachloride Using Iron and Palladized-Iron Cathodes

Li, Tie, Farrell, James·2000·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This research investigated the effectiveness of electrochemical reduction for removing trichloroethylene (TCE) and carbon tetrachloride (CT) from dilute aqueous solutions. The kinetics, reaction mechanisms, and current efficiencies for TCE and CT reduction were investigated using flow-through, iron electrode reactors and with amperometric measurements of reduction rates. The electrode reactors were operated over a range of flow rates, pH, ionic strength, dissolved oxygen concentration, and working electrode potentials. Typical reduction half-lives for TCE and CT in the iron reactor were 9.4 and 3.7 min, respectively. The addition of palladium as an electrocatalyst at a level of 1 mg of Pd per m 2 of electrode surface area increased the reaction rates by a factor of 3. When operated continuously, reaction rates in the palladized-iron reactor were stable over a 9-month period of operation, indicating that there was no loss of palladium from the electrode. In both the iron and Pd−iron reactors, TCE was reduced primarily to ethane and ethene, while CT was reduced almost exclusively to methane. Under all operating conditions, chlorinated compounds accounted for less than 2% of the total reaction byproducts. Comparisons of amperometrically measured current efficiencies with those measured in the flow-through reactors and the weak effect of electrode potential on TCE reaction rates indicated that the primary pathway for TCE reduction by iron and palladized-iron electrodes is indirect and involves atomic hydrogen as the reducing agent. Direct reduction of TCE appeared to be inhibited by the preferential reduction of water. The finding that electrodes coated with a hydrophobic polymer to inhibit water reduction showed current efficiencies greater than 90% for direct TCE reduction supports this hypothesis. For CT, similar amperometric and analytically measured current efficiencies indicated that the primary mechanism for CT reduction is direct electron transfer. Carbon dioxide and bisulfide, which have been found to foul palladium in other catalytic systems, did not deactivate the catalyst. The fast reaction kinetics and electrode stability indicate that electrochemical reduction may be feasible for treating waters contaminated with chlorinated organic compounds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es9907358

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Li, T., & Farrell, J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1999-12-04
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
173-179
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2069900094
Cited by
277
References
13
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.