Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nickel Dithiolenes Revisited: Structures and Electron Distribution from Density Functional Theory for the Three-Member Electron-Transfer Series [Ni(S2C2Me2)2]0,1-,2-

Lim, Booyong S., Fomitchev, Dmitry V., Holm, R. H.·2001·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

The complexes [Ni(S2C2Me2)2](z) (z = 0, 1-, 2-) have been isolated for the purpose of investigating their electronic structures in a reversible three-member electron-transfer series. Members are interrelated by reversible redox reactions with E(1/2)(0/1-) = -0.15 V and E(1/2)(1-/2-) = -1.05 V versus SCE in acetonitrile. The three complexes have nearly planar structures of idealized D(2)(h) symmetry. As the series is traversed in the reducing direction, Ni-S and C-S bond lengths increase; the chelate ring C-C bond length decreases from the neutral complex to the monoanion and does not change significantly in the dianion. Structural trends are compared with previous results for [Ni(S2C2R2)2)](1-,2-). Following the geometrical changes, values of nu(Ni)(-)(S) and nu(C)(-)(S) decrease, while the value of nu(C)(-)(C) increases with increased reduction. Geometry optimizations at the density functional theory (DFT) level were performed for all members of the series. Geometrical parameters obtained from the calculations are in good agreement with the experimental findings. The 5b(2g) orbital was identified as the LUMO in [Ni(S2C2Me2)2], the SOMO in [Ni(S2C2Me2)2](1-), and the HOMO in [Ni(S2C2Me2)2]2-. Unlike in the situation in the [M(CO)2-(S2C2Me2)2]z series (M = Mo, W; z = 0, 1-, 2-), the apparent contribution from the metal d orbital in the electroactive orbital is not constant. In the present series, the d(xz) contribution increases from 13 to 20 to 39% upon passing from the neutral to the monoanionic to the dianionic complex. Accurate calculation of EPR g-values of [Ni(S2C2Me2)2]1- by DFT serves as a test for the reliability of the electronic structure calculations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic010138y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Chemistry with ADF

    te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Lim, B. S., Fomitchev, D. V., & Holm, R. H.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2001-07-10
Volume
40
Issue
17
Pages
4257-4262
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W2043341671
Cited by
159
References
1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.