The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study on the Reversible Electrode Reaction of Na1–xNi0.5Mn0.5O2 for a Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Battery
Abstract
Layered NaNi(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2) (space group: R ̅3m), having an O3-type (α-NaFeO(2) type) structure according to the Delmas' notation, is prepared by a solid-state method. The electrochemical reactivity of NaNi(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2) is examined in an aprotic sodium cell at room temperature. The NaNi(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2) electrodes can deliver ca. 105-125 mAh g(-1) at rates of 240-4.8 mA g(-1) in the voltage range of 2.2-3.8 V and show 75% of the initial reversible capacity after 50 charge/discharge cycling tests. In the voltage range of 2.2-4.5 V, a higher reversible capacity of 185 mAh g(-1) is achieved; however, its reversibility is insufficient because of the significant expansion of interslab space by charging to 4.5 V versus sodium. The reversbility is improved by adding fluoroethylene carbonate into the electrolyte solution. The structural transition mechanism of Na(1-x)Ni(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2) is also examined by an ex situ X-ray diffraction method combined with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The staking sequence of the [Ni(0.5)Mn(0.5)]O(2) slabs changes progressively as sodium ions are extracted from the crystal lattice. It is observed that the original O3 phase transforms into the O'3, P3, P'3, and P3" phases during sodium extraction. XAS measurement proves that NaNi(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2) consists of divalent nickel and tetravalent manganese ions. As sodium ions are extracted from the oxide to form Na(1-x)Ni(0.5)Mn(0.5)O(2), nickel ions are oxidized to the trivalent state, while the manganese ions are electrochemically inactive as the tetravalent state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Cited by
Rational design of layered oxide materials for sodium-ion batteries
Zhao, C., Wang, Q., Yao, Z., Wang, J., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Ding, F., Qi, X., Lu, Y., Bai, X., Li, B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay9972 · Cited by 1,540
A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries
Han, M. H., Gonzalo, E., Singh, G., & Rojo, T. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03192j · Cited by 1,380
Update on Na-based battery materials. A growing research path
Palomares, V., Casas-Cabanas, M., Castillo-Martínez, E., Han, M. H., & Rojo, T. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee41031e · Cited by 992
A zero-strain layered metal oxide as the negative electrode for long-life sodium-ion batteries
Wang, Y., Yu, X., Xu, S., Bai, J., Xiao, R., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Yang, X.-Q., Chen, L., & Huang, X. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3365 · Cited by 616
Interphases in Sodium‐Ion Batteries
Song, J., Xiao, B., Lin, Y., Xu, K., & Li, X. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201703082 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Komaba, S., Yabuuchi, N., Nakayama, T., Ogata, A., Ishikawa, T., & Nakai, I.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-05-24
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6211-6220
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W2008466218
- Cited by
- 822
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on the Reversible Electrode Reaction of Na1–xNi0.5Mn0.5O2 for a Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ic300357d
- The paper
- Komaba, S., Yabuuchi, N., Nakayama, T., Ogata, A., Ishikawa, T., & Nakai, I. (2012). Study on the Reversible Electrode Reaction of Na1–xNi0.5Mn0.5O2 for a Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Battery. Inorganic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic300357d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.