The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution
Abstract
In an aqueous solution, photophysical, photochemical, and photocatalytic abilities of a Ru(II)-Re(I) binuclear complex (RuReCl), of which Ru(II) photosensitizer and Re(I) catalyst units were connected with a bridging ligand, have been investigated in details. RuReCl could photocatalyze CO2 reduction using ascorbate as an electron donor, even in an aqueous solution. The main product of the photocatalytic reaction was formic acid in the aqueous solution; this is very different in product distribution from that in a dimethylformamide (DMF) and triethanolamine (TEOA) mixed solution in which the main product was CO. A (13)CO2 labeling experiment clearly showed that formic acid was produced from CO2. The turnover number and selectivity of the formic acid production were 25 and 83%, respectively. The quantum yield of the formic acid formation was 0.2%, which was much lower, compared to that in the DMF-TEOA mixed solution. Detail studies of the photochemical electron-transfer process showed back-electron transfer from the one-electron-reduced species (OERS) of the photosensitizer unit to an oxidized ascorbate efficiently proceeded, and this should be one of the main reasons why the photocatalytic efficiency was lower in the aqueous solution. In the aqueous solution, ligand substitution of the Ru(II) photosensitizer unit proceeded during the photocatalytic reaction, which was a main deactivation process of the photocatalytic reaction. The product of the ligand substitution was a Ru(II) bisdiimine complex or complexes with ascorbate as a ligand or ligands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cocatalysts for Selective Photoreduction of CO2into Solar Fuels
Li, X., Yu, J., Jaroniec, M., & Chen, X. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00400 · Cited by 2,304
Molecular polypyridine-based metal complexes as catalysts for the reduction of CO2
Elgrishi, N., Chambers, M. B., Wang, X., & Fontecave, M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00391a · Cited by 555
Hydrogen energy future with formic acid: a renewable chemical hydrogen storage system
Singh, A. K., Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2016) · Catalysis Science & Technology · doi:10.1039/c5cy01276g · Cited by 543
Yaashikaa, P. R., Senthil Kumar, P., Varjani, S. J., & Saravanan, A. (2019) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.017 · Cited by 508
Chen, L., Guo, Z., Wei, X.-G., Gallenkamp, C., Bonin, J., Anxolabéhère-Mallart, E., Lau, K.-C., Lau, T.-C., & Robert, M. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06535 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakada, A., Koike, K., Nakashima, T., Morimoto, T., & Ishitani, O.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-02-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1800-1807
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W2321228589
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ic502707t
- The paper
- Nakada, A., Koike, K., Nakashima, T., Morimoto, T., & Ishitani, O. (2015). Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid Using a Ru(II)–Re(I) Supramolecular Complex in an Aqueous Solution. Inorganic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic502707t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.