The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental and Theoretical Comparison of Actinide and Lanthanide Bonding in M[N(EPR2)2]3 Complexes (M = U, Pu, La, Ce; E = S, Se, Te; R = Ph, i Pr, H)
Abstract
Treatment of M[N(SiMe3)2]3 (M = U, Pu (An); La, Ce (Ln)) with NH(EPPh2)2 and NH(EPiPr2)2 (E = S, Se), afforded the neutral complexes M[N(EPR2)2]3 (R = Ph, iPr). Tellurium donor complexes were synthesized by treatment of MI3(sol)4 (M = U, Pu; sol = py and M = La, Ce; sol = thf) with Na(tmeda)[N(TePiPr2)2]. The complexes have been structurally and spectroscopically characterized with concomitant computational modeling through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The An-E bond lengths are shorter than the Ln-E bond lengths for metal ions of similar ionic radii, consistent with an increase in covalent interactions in the actinide bonding relative to the lanthanide bonding. In addition, the magnitude of the differences in the bonding is slightly greater with increasing softness of the chalcogen donor atom. The DFT calculations for the model systems correlate well with experimentally determined metrical parameters. They indicate that the enhanced covalency in the M-E bond as group 16 is descended arises mostly from increased metal d-orbital participation. Conversely, an increase in f-orbital participation is responsible for the enhancement of covalency in An-E bonds compared to Ln-E bonds. The fundamental and practical importance of such studies of the role of the valence d and f orbitals in the bonding of the f elements is emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Jensen, M. P., & Bond, A. H. (2002) · Radiochimica Acta · doi:10.1524/ract.2002.90.4_2002.205 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Doping Lanthanide into Perovskite Nanocrystals: Highly Improved and Expanded Optical Properties
Pan, G., Bai, X., Yang, D., Chen, X., Jing, P., Qu, S., Zhang, L., Zhou, D., Zhu, J., Xu, W., et al. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04575 · Cited by 935
Kaltsoyannis, N. (2013) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic3006025 · Cited by 356
Self-citationRecent Developments in Synthesis and Structural Chemistry of Nonaqueous Actinide Complexes
Jones, M. B., & Gaunt, A. J. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300198m · Cited by 323
Self-citationMetal–ligand multiple bonding in uranium: structure and reactivity
Hayton, T. W. (2010) · Dalton Trans. · doi:10.1039/b909238b · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Gaunt, A. J., Reilly, S. D., Enriquez, A. E., Scott, B. L., Ibers, J. A., Sekar, P., Ingram, K. I. M., Kaltsoyannis, N., & Neu, M. P.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-41
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W1971178956
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.