The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water Oxidation by a Ruthenium Complex with Noninnocent Quinone Ligands: Possible Formation of an O−O Bond at a Low Oxidation State of the Metal
Abstract
Tanaka and co-workers reported a novel dinuclear Ru complex, [Ru2(OH)2(3,6-Bu2Q)2(btpyan)](SbF6)2 (3,6-Bu2Q = 3,6-di tert-butyl-1,2-benzoquinone, btpyan = 1,8-bis(2,2':6',2''-terpyrid-4'-yl)anthracene), that contains redox active quinone ligands and has an excellent electrocatalytic activity for water oxidation when immobilized on an indium-tin-oxide electrode (Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 329-337). The novel features of the dinuclear and related mononuclear Ru species with quinone ligands, and comparison of their properties to those of the Ru analogues with the bpy ligand (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) replacing quinone, are summarized here together with new theoretical and experimental results that show striking features for both the dinuclear and mononuclear species. The identity and oxidation state of key mononuclear species, including the previously reported oxyl radical, have been reassigned. Our gas-phase theoretical calculations indicate that the Tanaka Ru-dinuclear catalyst seems to maintain predominantly Ru(II) centers while the quinone ligands and water moiety are involved in redox reactions throughout the entire catalytic cycle for water oxidation. Our theoretical study identifies [Ru2(O2(-))(Q(-1.5))2(btpyan)](0) as a key intermediate and the most reduced catalyst species that is formed by removal of all four protons before four-electron oxidation takes place. While our study toward understanding the complicated electronic and geometric structures of possible intermediates in the catalytic cycle is still in progress, the current status and new directions for kinetic and mechanistic investigations, and key issues and challenges in water oxidation with the Tanaka catalyst (and its analogues with Cl(-) or NO(2-)substituted quinones and a species with a xanthene bridge instead an antheracene) are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Cited by
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Artificial Photosynthesis: Molecular Systems for Catalytic Water Oxidation
Kärkäs, M. D., Verho, O., Johnston, E. V., & Åkermark, B. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400572f · Cited by 1,376
Duan, L., Fischer, A., Xu, Y., & Sun, L. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9034686 · Cited by 522
Mononuclear Ruthenium(II) Complexes That Catalyze Water Oxidation
Tseng, H.-W., Zong, R., Muckerman, J. T., & Thummel, R. (2008) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic8014817 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muckerman, J. T., Polyansky, D. E., Wada, T., Tanaka, K., & Fujita, E.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1787-1802
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W1991652943
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.