Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accessing Postsynthetic Modification in a Series of Metal-Organic Frameworks and the Influence of Framework Topology on Reactivity

Wang, Zhenqiang, Tanabe, Kristine K., Cohen, Seth M.·2009·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

2-Amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (NH(2)-BDC) has been found to be a compatible building block for the construction of two new metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that have structures isoreticular to reported MOFs that use 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (BDC) as a building block. DMOF-1-NH(2) (DABCO MOF-1-NH(2)) is a derivative of a previously studied MOF that contains two-dimensional square grids based on NH(2)-BDC and zinc(II) paddle-wheel units; the grid layers are connected by DABCO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) molecules that coordinate in the axial positions of the paddlewheel secondary-building units (SBUs). UMCM-1-NH(2) is an NH(2)-BDC derivative of UMCM-1 (University of Michigan Crystalline Material-1), a highly porous MOF reported by Matzger et al., and consists of both NH(2)-BDC and BTB (BTB = 4,4',4''-benzene-1,3,5-triyl-tribenzoate) linkers with Zn(4)O SBUs. The structure of UMCM-1-NH(2) was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. By using NH(2)-BDC to generate these MOFs, the pendant amino groups can serve as a chemical handle that can be manipulated via postsynthetic modification with alkyl anhydrides. Reactions of each MOF and different anhydrides have been performed to compare the extent of conversion, thermal and structural stability, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface areas afforded by the resulting materials. Under comparable reaction conditions, (1)H NMR of digested samples show that UMCM-1-NH(2) has conversions comparable to that of IRMOF-3, while DMOF-1-NH(2) only shows high conversions with smaller anhydrides. Under specific reaction conditions, higher conversions were obtained with complete retention of crystallinity, as verified by single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. The results presented here demonstrate three important findings: (a) NH(2)-BDC can be used as a surrogate for BDC in a number of MOFs thereby providing a handle for postsynthetic modification, (b) postsynthetic modification is a general strategy to functionalizing MOFs that can be applied to a variety of MOF structures, and (c) the topology and chemical/thermal stability of a MOF can influence the type of chemical reactions and reagents that can be used for postsynthetic modification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic801837t

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Tanabe, K. K., & Cohen, S. M.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2008-11-20
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
296-306
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W1988380153
Cited by
250
References
1
FWCI
14.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.