The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Ultrafiltration Membranes for the Separation of TiO2 Photocatalysts in Drinking Water Treatment
Abstract
This study investigated the ability of cross-flow ultrafiltration (UF), combined with photocatalytic reactions, to separate TiO 2 photocatalysts from treated water in photocatalytic drinking water treatment. The effect of natural organic matter (i.e., humic acids) and cross-flow velocities on UF fluxes and organic removal was explored with and without UV irradiation in the photocatalytic reactor. The interaction between the two solutes in the system, humic acids and TiO 2 photocatalysts, played a significant role in the formation of dense cake layers at the membrane surface, leading to a greater flux decline during ultrafiltration of TiO 2 particles. According to visual observations of the used membranes and the estimation of back-transport velocities of the solutes, a substantial amount of TiO 2 deposited on the membrane induces more humic acids to accumulate at the membrane through the adsorption of humic acids onto TiO 2 particles. The humic-acid-laden TiO 2 particles offered more than four times higher specific cake resistance with a substantially increased compressibility coefficient than TiO 2 particles alone. The higher the cross-flow velocities, the greater the UV 254 removal achieved. This was because the rise of cross-flow velocities contributed to the reduction of concentration polarization at the membrane surface, thereby resulting in a decrease of the driving force for humic acids to pass through the membrane. When photocatalytic reactions took place with UV illumination, UV 254 removal efficiencies of the permeate were improved markedly, and also the permeate flux was kept at a constant level without any sign of fouling. Although humic acids were not completely mineralized by photocatalysis, the degradation of the humic acids helped to enhance the UF flux, as they were transformed to less adsorbable compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review
Chong, M. N., Jin, B., Chow, C. W. K., & Saint, C. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 · Cited by 5,386
A review on advanced physico-chemical and biological textile dye wastewater treatment techniques
Donkadokula, N. Y., Kola, A. K., Naz, I., & Saroj, D. (2020) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-020-09543-z · Cited by 523
Bae, T.-H., & Tak, T.-M. (2005) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.008 · Cited by 494
Zhang, T., & Sun, D. D. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.04.001 · Cited by 91
Muppalla, R., Rana, H. H., Devi, S., & Jewrajka, S. K. (2013) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.098 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S.-A., Choo, K.-H., Lee, C.-H., Lee, H.-I., Hyeon, T., Choi, W., & Kwon, H.-H.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1712-1719
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2011759358
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Ultrafiltration Membranes for the Separation of TiO2 Photocatalysts in Drinking Water Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie000738p
- The paper
- Lee, S.-A., Choo, K.-H., Lee, C.-H., Lee, H.-I., Hyeon, T., Choi, W., & Kwon, H.-H. (2001). Use of Ultrafiltration Membranes for the Separation of TiO2 Photocatalysts in Drinking Water Treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie000738p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.