Cited by 75

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water Reclamation in the Textile Industry: Nanofiltration of Dye Baths for Wool Dyeing

Van der Bruggen, B., De Vreese, I., Vandecasteele, C.·2001·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

The textile industry is a large water consumer: dyeing, rinsing, and follow-up treatment of textiles use large amounts of freshwater. As regulations become more and more stringent and the cost of freshwater increases, reclamation of wastewater becomes more and more attractive. This paper explores the possibility of using nanofiltration to improve the wastewater quality to the standards that are used for the dyeing of wool. Four different samples from the wastewater treatment sequence of a textile factory were filtrated with three different nanofiltration membranes (NF70, UTC-20, and NTR 7450). The samples were a used and untreated metal complex dye bath, a used and untreated acid dye bath, a sample from the storage tank (containing a diluted mixture of the previous baths), and the effluent of the biological treatment. Nanofiltration was possible for all samples, but the biologically treated dye baths showed a more efficient color removal. For direct nanofiltration of used dye baths, two membrane passages would be needed to provide the required permeate quality. Flux decline due to adsorption of organic material on the membrane decreased the membrane capacity by up to 73%, but the process water flux reached a stable value in all experiments. The flux decline was less important for the biologically treated water. The effect of flux decline was only partly reversible; the effect of osmotic pressure on the process water flux is fully reversible. It was found that flux decline is…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie010104y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nanofiltration (or low pressure reverse osmosis) of biologically treated colored wastewater involves less fouling than direct nanofiltration of dye baths.

    “For reusable water production, researchers have recurrently referred to nanofiltration (or low pressure reverse osmosis) of biologically treated colored wastewater since this option involves less fouling as compared to that for direct nanofiltration of dye baths.33”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [33]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Coste C., 1996, Workshop on Advanced Wastewater Treatment. Belgian Commission IAWQ
  2. Winkler K., 1997, Chem. Tech., 49, 23
  3. Hao J., 1994, Desalination, 98, 353, 10.1016/0011-9164(94)00161-8 · DOI
  4. Sojka-Ledakowicz J., 1998, Desalination, 199, 1, 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00078-2 · DOI
  5. Tegtmeyer D., 1992, Meeting of the Union of Textile Chemists and Colorists
  6. Rautenbach R., 1990, Desalination, 7, 73, 10.1016/0011-9164(90)85021-2 · DOI
  7. Correira V. M., 1994, Environ. Sci. Technol., 15, 917, 10.1080/09593339409385500 · DOI
  8. Ministry, 2000, Oct.
  9. European Commission, 1991, Council Directive of
  10. Abrahart E. N., 1977, Dyes and their intermediates
  11. Clariant, 2000, Textile dyes for wool and sink. Website: http://ppp.clariant.com/dyes/wool-set.htm
  12. DyStar, 1998, Dec 11
  13. Ciba-Geigy, 2000, Ciba Specialty Chemicals/Colors/Textiles/Dyes (Polyamide). Website: http://www.cibasc.com/di/col/tf/op/tex/dy/dy_01.asp#5
  14. Clesceri L. S., 1989, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
  15. Pitzer K. S, 1973, J. Phys. Chem., 77, 268, 10.1021/j100621a026 · DOI
  16. Van der Bruggen B., 2001, Mechanisms of retention and flux decline for the nanofiltration of dye baths from the textile industry. Sep. Purif. Technol

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Van der Bruggen, B., De Vreese, I., & Vandecasteele, C.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2001-08-11
Volume
40
Issue
18
Pages
3973-3978
ISSN
  • 0888-5885
  • 1520-5045
Cited by
75
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review