The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Water Reclamation in the Textile Industry: Nanofiltration of Dye Baths for Wool Dyeing
Abstract
The textile industry is a large water consumer: dyeing, rinsing, and follow-up treatment of textiles use large amounts of freshwater. As regulations become more and more stringent and the cost of freshwater increases, reclamation of wastewater becomes more and more attractive. This paper explores the possibility of using nanofiltration to improve the wastewater quality to the standards that are used for the dyeing of wool. Four different samples from the wastewater treatment sequence of a textile factory were filtrated with three different nanofiltration membranes (NF70, UTC-20, and NTR 7450). The samples were a used and untreated metal complex dye bath, a used and untreated acid dye bath, a sample from the storage tank (containing a diluted mixture of the previous baths), and the effluent of the biological treatment. Nanofiltration was possible for all samples, but the biologically treated dye baths showed a more efficient color removal. For direct nanofiltration of used dye baths, two membrane passages would be needed to provide the required permeate quality. Flux decline due to adsorption of organic material on the membrane decreased the membrane capacity by up to 73%, but the process water flux reached a stable value in all experiments. The flux decline was less important for the biologically treated water. The effect of flux decline was only partly reversible; the effect of osmotic pressure on the process water flux is fully reversible. It was found that flux decline is…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanofiltration (or low pressure reverse osmosis) of biologically treated colored wastewater involves less fouling than direct nanofiltration of dye baths.
“For reusable water production, researchers have recurrently referred to nanofiltration (or low pressure reverse osmosis) of biologically treated colored wastewater since this option involves less fouling as compared to that for direct nanofiltration of dye baths.33”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Coste C., 1996, Workshop on Advanced Wastewater Treatment. Belgian Commission IAWQ
- Winkler K., 1997, Chem. Tech., 49, 23
- Hao J., 1994, Desalination, 98, 353, 10.1016/0011-9164(94)00161-8 · DOI
- Sojka-Ledakowicz J., 1998, Desalination, 199, 1, 10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00078-2 · DOI
- Tegtmeyer D., 1992, Meeting of the Union of Textile Chemists and Colorists
- Rautenbach R., 1990, Desalination, 7, 73, 10.1016/0011-9164(90)85021-2 · DOI
- Correira V. M., 1994, Environ. Sci. Technol., 15, 917, 10.1080/09593339409385500 · DOI
- Ministry, 2000, Oct.
- European Commission, 1991, Council Directive of
- Abrahart E. N., 1977, Dyes and their intermediates
- Clariant, 2000, Textile dyes for wool and sink. Website: http://ppp.clariant.com/dyes/wool-set.htm
- DyStar, 1998, Dec 11
- Ciba-Geigy, 2000, Ciba Specialty Chemicals/Colors/Textiles/Dyes (Polyamide). Website: http://www.cibasc.com/di/col/tf/op/tex/dy/dy_01.asp#5
- Clesceri L. S., 1989, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
- Pitzer K. S, 1973, J. Phys. Chem., 77, 268, 10.1021/j100621a026 · DOI
- Van der Bruggen B., 2001, Mechanisms of retention and flux decline for the nanofiltration of dye baths from the textile industry. Sep. Purif. Technol
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Van der Bruggen, B., De Vreese, I., & Vandecasteele, C.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-08-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3973-3978
- ISSN
- 0888-5885
- 1520-5045
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review