Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical Associating Fluid Theory: A Successful Model for the Calculation of Thermodynamic and Phase Equilibrium Properties of Complex Fluid Mixtures

Economou, Ioannis G.·2002·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
DOI 10.1021/ie0102201
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT) is a powerful model for thermodynamic property and phase equilibrium calculations for fluid mixtures. In this paper, the model development, modifications, and generalizations proposed over the past decade are reviewed. Emphasis is given to developments resulting in equations of state applicable to real fluids. In addition, theoretical models are reviewed. Applications are discussed, and representative calculations are presented with emphasis on aqueous systems and polymers. Despite its wide acceptance, SAFT has several limitations that are discussed here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie0102201

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Economou, I. G.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2001-10-04
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
953-962
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
DOI
10.1021/ie0102201
OpenAlex
W1972839841
Cited by
405
References
25
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.