Cited by 176CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Development of a New CO2 Sequestration Process Utilizing the Carbonation of Waste Cement

Iizuka, Atsushi, Fujii, Minoru, Yamasaki, Akihiro, Yanagisawa, Yukio·2004·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

We propose a new sequestration process for anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) that uses waste cement. The proposed process consists of two main reactions. The first is the extraction of calcium ions (Ca 2+ ) from waste cement particles by pressurized carbon dioxide (several megapascals of pressure). The second is the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ). Ca 2+ extracted from waste cement is deposited as CaCO 3 when the pressure is reduced. CaCO 3 is disposed of directly, or recycled as a raw material for cement production. In the latter case, the same amount of CO 2 is considered to be sequestered because the net amount of virgin limestone mined can be reduced. The power consumption and cost of the proposed sequestration process for CO 2 emitted from a 100 MW thermal power plant were evaluated, on the basis of laboratory-scale experimental results. The power consumption for the operating process strongly depended on the operating conditions such as the cement/water ratio, the CO 2 pressure, and the average cement diameter. The minimum power consumption was 25.9 MW/100 MW of power generation when optimized within the operating conditions studied experimentally, and the sequestration cost associated with the power consumption (excluding capital and maintenance) would be about $22.6/t of carbon dioxide. This result indicates that the present process is highly competitive with previously reported CO 2 sequestration scenarios such as ocean sequestration. Sensitivity analysis of the operating parameters was carried out on the operating power consumption, and it was found that a smaller ratio of waste cement to water and a lower CO 2 pressure will decrease the operating power consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie0496176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iizuka, A., Fujii, M., Yamasaki, A., & Yanagisawa, Y.
Affiliations
National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
Corresponding author
Iizuka, Atsushi
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2004-10-28
Volume
43
Issue
24
Pages
7880-7887
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2091820664
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
CO2 sequestration, carbonation, calcium carbonate precipitation, pressurized CO2, cement recycling, limestone substitution, thermal power plant emissions, power consumption, water-cement ratio, CO2 pressure, cement particle size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review