Development of a New CO2 Sequestration Process Utilizing the Carbonation of Waste Cement
Abstract
We propose a new sequestration process for anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) that uses waste cement. The proposed process consists of two main reactions. The first is the extraction of calcium ions (Ca 2+ ) from waste cement particles by pressurized carbon dioxide (several megapascals of pressure). The second is the precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ). Ca 2+ extracted from waste cement is deposited as CaCO 3 when the pressure is reduced. CaCO 3 is disposed of directly, or recycled as a raw material for cement production. In the latter case, the same amount of CO 2 is considered to be sequestered because the net amount of virgin limestone mined can be reduced. The power consumption and cost of the proposed sequestration process for CO 2 emitted from a 100 MW thermal power plant were evaluated, on the basis of laboratory-scale experimental results. The power consumption for the operating process strongly depended on the operating conditions such as the cement/water ratio, the CO 2 pressure, and the average cement diameter. The minimum power consumption was 25.9 MW/100 MW of power generation when optimized within the operating conditions studied experimentally, and the sequestration cost associated with the power consumption (excluding capital and maintenance) would be about $22.6/t of carbon dioxide. This result indicates that the present process is highly competitive with previously reported CO 2 sequestration scenarios such as ocean sequestration. Sensitivity analysis of the operating parameters was carried out on the operating power consumption, and it was found that a smaller ratio of waste cement to water and a lower CO 2 pressure will decrease the operating power consumption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OS FA could capture 10-12% of CO2 emitted from the OS based heat and power sector.
“for instance OS FA could capture 10-12% of CO 2 emitted from OS based heat and power sector 161”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [161]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub>
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
Carbon capture and storage using alkaline industrial wastes
Bobicki, E. R., Liu, Q., Xu, Z., & Zeng, H. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.11.002 · Cited by 666 · see citing works
A review of mineral carbonation technology in sequestration of CO2
Olajire, A. A. (2013) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2013.03.013 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Pan, S.-Y., Chang, E. E., & Chiang, P.-C. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.06.0149 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Development of a new pH-swing CO2 mineralization process with a recyclable reaction solution
KODAMA, S., NISHIMOTO, T., YAMAMOTO, N., YOGO, K., & YAMADA, K. (2008) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.01.005 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Potential of CO 2 sequestration through construction and demolition (C&D) waste—An overview
Kaliyavaradhan, S. K., & Ling, T.-C. (2017) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.05.014 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Liu, B., Qin, J., Shi, J., Jiang, J., Wu, X., & He, Z. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121660 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Polettini, A., Pomi, R., & Stramazzo, A. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.015 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM)–A UK perspective
Sanna, A., Dri, M., Hall, M. R., & Maroto-Valer, M. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.049 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Thin-film versus slurry-phase carbonation of steel slag: CO2 uptake and effects on mineralogy
Baciocchi, R., Costa, G., Di Gianfilippo, M., Polettini, A., Pomi, R., & Stramazzo, A. (2015) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.016 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Carbonation of Stainless Steel Slag as a Process for CO2 Storage and Slag Valorization
Baciocchi, R., Costa, G., Di Bartolomeo, E., Polettini, A., & Pomi, R. (2010) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-010-9047-1 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Iizuka, A., Fujii, M., Yamasaki, A., & Yanagisawa, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Iizuka, Atsushi
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-10-28
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7880-7887
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2091820664
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- CO2 sequestration, carbonation, calcium carbonate precipitation, pressurized CO2, cement recycling, limestone substitution, thermal power plant emissions, power consumption, water-cement ratio, CO2 pressure, cement particle size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review