The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of Proton Conductivity Measurement in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane for Fuel Cell Application
Abstract
The precise impedance measurement system based on the well-known two-probe and four-probe methods was prepared to measure the impedance and consequent proton conductivity of Nafion membranes as standard samples, considering not only the number of electrodes and the bridging methods but also the elimination of electrical error sources for the precise electrical analysis. The proton conductivities of Nafion membranes are reported and discussed in the present study with respect to different cell configurations and measurement conditions. The values of proton conductivities measured using the four-probe method were always higher (2−5 times) than those measured using the two-probe method at ambient humidity and temperature. The proton conductivities were also measured under two different humidity conditions: water-vapor state and liquid-water state. In the water-vapor state (95% relative humidity), completely different impedance behaviors for the identical Nafion membrane were observed from the Nyquist impedance plots. All Nyquist plots derived from the two-probe method represented the inductive reactance derived from various components, such as Pt electrodes, electric conductive leads, and a potentiometer in the path of current flow rather than the capacitive reactance between Pt electrodes. The effect of contact resistance between the membrane sample and electrodes on proton conductivity was also investigated by using the two conductivity-cell configurations. It was shown that the effect of the contact resistance on the proton conductivity was more severe in the two-probe measurement, and this factor should be seriously considered in the water-vapor state. Furthermore, the humidity and the temperature effects on the proton conductivity of the membranes were observed under various measuring conditions and compared with the two different cell configurations. The four-probe method well reflected the proton conductivity behavior of Nafion membrane in the wide range of temperature and humidity, as compared with the two-probe method with reasonable proton conductivity in the low humidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes
Zawodzinski, T. A., Neeman, M., Sillerud, L. O., & Gottesfeld, S. (1991) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100168a060 · Cited by 987
Cited by
Pan, M., Pan, C., Li, C., & Zhao, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110771 · Cited by 357
Rangel-Cárdenas, A., & Koper, G. (2017) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma10060576 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C. H., Park, H. B., Lee, Y. M., & Lee, R. D.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-25
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7617-7626
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2058424575
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of Proton Conductivity Measurement in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane for Fuel Cell Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie0501172
- The paper
- Lee, C. H., Park, H. B., Lee, Y. M., & Lee, R. D. (2005). Importance of Proton Conductivity Measurement in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane for Fuel Cell Application. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0501172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.