Modeling of Hammerstein−Wiener Processes with Special Input Test Signals
Abstract
Blocks in Hammerstein−Wiener nonlinear processes, in which an input static nonlinear block, a linear dynamic block, and an output static nonlinear block are connected in a series, have numbers of parameters, and their parametric identifications usually require solving multidimensional nonlinear optimization problems. Unless the initial values are appropriately determined, multidimensional nonlinear optimization methods suffer from poor convergence and heavy computational loads. To reduce such problems, three special test signals of two binary input signals and a multistep signal are proposed. Combining responses of these test inputs, the model parameters of each block in the Hammerstein−Wiener process can be identified sequentially without solving a multidimensional nonlinear optimization problem. From responses of two binary test inputs with different sizes, the model parameters of the output nonlinear static function are estimated by solving a one-dimensional nonlinear optimization problem and the linear dynamic block is identified using well-established linear system identification methods. Finally, the model parameters of the input nonlinear static function are analytically identified from the response of the multistep test signal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Park and Lee [5] used a special test signal to separate identification of nonlinearity from the linear part for Wiener systems.
“Strategies for the identification of Wiener systems were represented in brief by Park and Lee in [5] using the special test signal whereby the identification of nonlinearity was separated from the linear part, and further extended for the Hammerstein-Wiener type process in [9].”
From Application of Fractional Calculus for Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Wiener Systems With Time Delay (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kothari, K. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367441 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Strategies for the identification of Wiener systems were represented in brief by Park and Lee in [5] using the special test signal whereby the identification of nonlinearity was separated from the linear part, and further extended for the Hammerstein-Wiener type process in [9].”
Method
- Authors
- Park, H. C., Sung, S. W., & Lee, J.
- Affiliations
- Kyungpook National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Jietae
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-06
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1029-1038
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2044062549
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kyungpook National University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- nonlinear system identification, initial value selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review