The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energy Performance of Stripper Configurations for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines
Abstract
Aqueous absorption/stripping is the state-of-the-art technology for the capture of CO 2 from coal-fired power plants. This technology is energy-intensive and has been applied to CO 2 removal from natural gas, ammonia, and hydrogen gas streams. Energy requirements can be reduced by the use of a more-reactive solvent, operating the cross exchanger at a lower temperature, optimizing the stripper operation, and using innovative stripper configurations (vacuum and multipressure). This work calculates stripper performance with an algorithm in Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM) that incorporates thermodynamic studies, reaction rate measurements, physical properties, and contactor-specific information for three stripper configurations a simple stripper operating at 160 kPa, a multipressure stripper operating at three pressures (330/230/160 kPa), and a vacuum stripper (30 kPa) for two solvents: 7 m (30 wt %) monoethanolamine (MEA) and 5 m K + /2.5 m piperazine. The temperature approach is varied from 5 to 10 °C. With some approximations, we predict the influence of using solvents with varying heats of desorption (Δ H des ) on the reboiler duty and the equivalent work for stripping (reboiler duty as equivalent Carnot work plus compression work). With a rich solution giving P CO 2 * = 2.5 kPa at 40 °C, the vacuum stripper is favored for solvents with Δ H des ≤ 21 kcal/(gmol of CO 2 ) while the multipressure configuration is attractive for solvents with Δ H des ≥ 21 kcal/(gmol of CO 2 ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology
Rochelle, G., Chen, E., Freeman, S., Van Wagener, D., Xu, Q., & Voice, A. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.011 · Cited by 549
Self-citationThermal degradation of monoethanolamine at stripper conditions
Davis, J., & Rochelle, G. (2009) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.045 · Cited by 339
Self-citationProperty impacts on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) processes: A review
Tan, Y., Nookuea, W., Li, H., Thorin, E., & Yan, J. (2016) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.079 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Oyenekan, B. A., & Rochelle, G. T.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2457-2464
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2040032908
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy Performance of Stripper Configurations for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie050548k
- The paper
- Oyenekan, B. A., & Rochelle, G. T. (2006). Energy Performance of Stripper Configurations for CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050548k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.