The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identifying Cost-Effective CO2 Control Levels for Amine-Based CO2 Capture Systems
Abstract
Studies of CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) from coal-fired power plants typically assume a capture efficiency near 90%, although the basis for a particular choice usually is not discussed. Nor do studies systematically explore a range of CO 2 capture efficiencies to identify the most cost-effective levels of CO 2 control and the key factors that affect such levels. An exploration of these issues is the focus of this paper. As part of the United States Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program, we have developed an integrated modeling framework (called IECM- cs ) to evaluate the performance and cost of alternative CCS technologies and power systems in the context of plant-level multipollutant control requirements. This paper uses IECM- cs to identify the most cost-effective level of CO 2 control using currently available amine-based CO 2 capture technology for PC plants. Two general cases are of interest. First, we examine the effects of systematically increasing the CO 2 capture efficiency of an amine-based system for PC applications over a broad range. We report two measures of cost: (i) capital cost and (ii) cost-effectiveness (cost per tonne of CO 2 avoided) relative to similar plants without CCS. Second, we examine the cost-effectiveness of plant designs that partially bypass the amine capture unit so as to achieve low to moderate reductions of CO 2, but at lower overall cost. Results from these cases are compared to the conventional case of a capture unit treating the entire flue gas stream. In each case, we identify the most cost-effective strategies and the key factors that affect those results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review
Yang, H., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Gupta, R., Slimane, R. B., Bland, A. E., & Wright, I. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1001-0742(08)60002-9 · Cited by 2,087
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
Deep Eutectic Solvents: Physicochemical Properties and Gas Separation Applications
García, G., Aparicio, S., Ullah, R., & Atilhan, M. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef5028873 · Cited by 1,112
Levelized cost of CO2mitigation from hydrogen production routes
Parkinson, B., Balcombe, P., Speirs, J. F., Hawkes, A. D., & Hellgardt, K. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee02079e · Cited by 579
CO2 capture adsorbents functionalized by amine – bearing polymers: A review
Varghese, A. M., & Karanikolos, G. N. (2020) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103005 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, A. B., & Rubin, E. S.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2421-2429
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2056209323
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Cost-Effective CO2 Control Levels for Amine-Based CO2 Capture Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie050603p
- The paper
- Rao, A. B., & Rubin, E. S. (2006). Identifying Cost-Effective CO2 Control Levels for Amine-Based CO2 Capture Systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050603p
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.