The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen Membrane Separation Techniques
Abstract
About 80% of the present world energy demand comes from fossil fuels. Unlike using fossil fuels, using hydrogen as an energy source produces water as the only byproduct. Use of hydrogen as an energy source could help to address issues related to energy security including global climate change and local air pollution. Moreover, hydrogen is abundantly available in the universe and possesses the highest energy content per unit of weight compared to any of the known fuels. Consequently, demand for hydrogen energy and production has been growing in the recent years. Membrane separation process is an attractive alternative compared to mature technologies such as pressure swing adsorption and cryogenic distillation. This paper reports different types of membranes used for hydrogen separation from hydrogen-rich mixtures. The study has found that much of the current research has been focused on nonpolymeric materials such as metal, molecular sieving carbon, zeolites, and ceramics. High purity of hydrogen is obtainable through dense metallic membranes and especially palladium and its alloys, which are highly selective to hydrogen. Thin membranes would not only reduce the cost of materials but also increase the hydrogen flux. Metal alloys or composite metal membranes have been used for hydrogen purification. However, metallic membranes are sensitive to some gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide. Therefore, ceramic membranes, inert to poisonous gases, are desirable. Inorganic microporous membranes offer many advantages over thin-film palladium membranes. More importantly, in microporous membranes, the flux is directly proportional to the pressure, whereas in palladium membranes, it is proportional to the square root of the pressure. The paper also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different hydrogen separation membranes. Also, the paper reports performance of selected membranes in terms of hydrogen selectivity and permeability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen generation via conventional and membrane reactors: A review
Iulianelli, A., Ribeirinha, P., Mendes, A., & Basile, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.032 · Cited by 503
Water gas shift reaction for hydrogen production and carbon dioxide capture: A review
Chen, W.-H., & Chen, C.-Y. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114078 · Cited by 486
Abanades, J. C., Arias, B., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T., Wiley, D. E., Li, H., Ho, M. T., Mangano, E., & Brandani, S. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.018 · Cited by 441
Exergoenvironmental analysis of a steam methane reforming process for hydrogen production
Boyano, A., Blanco-Marigorta, A. M., Morosuk, T., & Tsatsaronis, G. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.020 · Cited by 317
Synthesis of Stable Shape-Controlled Catalytically Active β-Palladium Hydride
Zhao, Z., Huang, X., Li, M., Wang, G., Lee, C., Zhu, E., Duan, X., & Huang, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b11543 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Adhikari, S., & Fernando, S.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-01-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 875-881
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2093249196
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen Membrane Separation Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie050644l
- The paper
- Adhikari, S., & Fernando, S. (2006). Hydrogen Membrane Separation Techniques. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050644l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.