Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology

Open access
Ho, Minh T., Allinson, Guy W., Wiley, Dianne E.·2008·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Studies of CO 2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO 2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO 2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO 2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO 2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO 2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO 2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO 2 avoided when the CO 2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO 2 /N 2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m 2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie070541y

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2008-02-09
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
1562-1568
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2054531987
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
29.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie070541y
The paper
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008). Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070541y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.