The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology
Open accessAbstract
Studies of CO 2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO 2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO 2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO 2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO 2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO 2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO 2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO 2 avoided when the CO 2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO 2 /N 2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m 2 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Reducing the Cost of CO 2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566
Self-citationAbanades, J. C., Arias, B., Lyngfelt, A., Mattisson, T., Wiley, D. E., Li, H., Ho, M. T., Mangano, E., & Brandani, S. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.018 · Cited by 441
Self-citationPVAm–PIP/PS Composite Membrane with High Performance for CO2/N2 Separation
Qiao, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Yuan, S., Zhu, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2013) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.13781 · Cited by 398
CO2 Capture from Dilute Gases as a Component of Modern Global Carbon Management
Jones, C. W. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114252 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-02-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1562-1568
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2054531987
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie070541y
- The paper
- Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008). Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070541y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.