The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Investigation on CO2 Post−Combustion Capture by Indirect Thermal Swing Adsorption Using 13X and 5A Zeolites
Abstract
Experimental results of CO 2 post-combustion capture for a TSA process including an internal heat-exchanger (indirect heating/cooling) are presented. The comparative experimental study is carried out on 13X and 5A zeolites, with a mixture 90% N 2 −10% CO 2 modeling the flue gas. With 5A zeolite having given the best performances, we tested it with various operating conditions including one with nitrogen purge during desorption. This one showed a good compromise between CO 2 capture rate, purity of the desorbate, volumetric productivity, and specific-heat consumption. We obtained a volumetric productivity of 37 kg CO2 /m 3 ads ·h and a specific-heat consumption of 6 MJ/kg CO2 at our laboratory scale and 4.5 MJ/kg CO2 for the adiabatic estimate (in the same order of magnitude as those obtained industrially with the reference MEA amine process). These results are promising because our process is not optimized yet and the scale-up on an industrial version involves a reduction in specific-heat consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spath, P. L., & Mann, M. K. (2004) · doi:10.2172/15006537 · Cited by 113
Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage
Uddin, S. N., & Barreto, L. (2007) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.04.009 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation
Nugent, P., Belmabkhout, Y., Burd, S. D., Cairns, A. J., Luebke, R., Forrest, K., Pham, T., Ma, S., Space, B., Wojtas, L., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11893 · Cited by 2,387
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption
Yu, C.-H., Huang, C.-H., & Tan, C.-S. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132 · Cited by 1,730
CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0ee00064g · Cited by 1,611
Data-driven design of metal–organic frameworks for wet flue gas CO2 capture
Boyd, P. G., Chidambaram, A., García-Díez, E., Ireland, C. P., Daff, T. D., Bounds, R., Gładysiak, A., Schouwink, P., Moosavi, S. M., Maroto-Valer, M. M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1798-7 · Cited by 885
Metadata
- Authors
- Merel, J., Clausse, M., & Meunier, F.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-215
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2050821402
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
