The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Activity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 Hybrid Photocatalysts through Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Mechanism under Visible Light
Abstract
Highly efficient visible-light-driven g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 3 PO 4 hybrid photocatalysts with different weight ratios of g-C 3 N 4 were prepared by a facile in situ precipitation method and characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectrometry and UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Under visible-light irradiation (>440 nm), g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 3 PO 4 photocatalysts displayed the higher photocatalytic activity than pure g-C 3 N 4 and Ag 3 PO 4 for the decolorization of methyl orange (MO). Among the hybrid photocatalysts, g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 3 PO 4 with 25 wt % of g-C 3 N 4 exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity for the decolorization of MO. The complete decolorization of MO was achieved for only 5 min of visible-light irradiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results revealed that metallic Ag particles on the surface of g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 3 PO 4 hybrid were formed during the catalysts preparation. In addition, the quenching effects of different scavengers displayed that the reactive h + and O 2 •– play the major role in the MO decolorization. The photocatalytic activity enhancement of g-C 3 N 4 /Ag 3 PO 4 hybrid photocatalysts could be ascribed to the efficient separation of electron–hole pairs through a Z-scheme system composed of Ag 3 PO 4, Ag and g-C 3 N 4, in which Ag particles act as the charge separation center. The evidence of the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism of the hybrid photocatalysts could be obtained from a photoluminescence technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis
Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00033a004 · Cited by 18,495
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Liao, G., Gong, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, H., Yang, G.-J., & Fang, B. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee00717b · Cited by 1,075
Yu, W., Xu, D., & Peng, T. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta05503b · Cited by 937
Mousavi, M., Habibi-Yangjeh, A., & Abitorabi, M. (2016) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.07.021 · Cited by 532
Kumar, A., Raizada, P., Singh, P., Saini, R. V., Saini, A. K., & Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123496 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Katsumata, H., Sakai, T., Suzuki, T., & Kaneco, S.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-29
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8018-8025
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2320445278
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Activity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 Hybrid Photocatalysts through Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Mechanism under Visible Light. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie5012036
- The paper
- Katsumata, H., Sakai, T., Suzuki, T., & Kaneco, S. (2014). Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Activity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 Hybrid Photocatalysts through Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Mechanism under Visible Light. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5012036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.