Cited by 55Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisCatalysts for Methane ReformingCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kinetic Analysis of Methanol to Dimethyl Ether Reaction over H-MFI Catalyst

Migliori, Massimo, Aloise, Alfredo, Catizzone, Enrico, Giordano, Girolamo·2014·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

This paper reports the kinetic analysis of methanol dehydration to dimethyl ether (DME) on a zeolitic MFI-type catalyst. For this reaction, γ-alumina is the most used catalyst, but the use of a zeolite, such as H-MFI, is gaining greater attention because these materials exhibit a better stability against water presence and can modulate the catalyst acidity acting on different parameters (e.g., Si/Al ratio or postsynthesis treatments). The kinetic analysis of H-MFI is performed by using experimental data of methanol conversion in a differential reactor and in an integral reactor. By including the most important kinetic models proposed in the literature for alumina, kinetic parameters (as a function of temperature) in the case of H-MFI are calculated, and the comparison between different models is also presented and discussed. In addition a new kinetic model is proposed and data fitting is preferable with respect to literature equations: also data of activation energy are in agreement with literature findings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie502775u

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Semelsberger T. A., 2006, J. Power Sources, 156, 497, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.082 · DOI
  2. Arcoumanis C., 2008, Fuel, 87, 1014, 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.007 · DOI
  3. Ogawa T., 2003, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 12, 219
  4. Cheng C., 2011, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28, 1511, 10.1007/s11814-011-0018-4 · DOI
  5. Hu J., 2005, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44, 1722, 10.1021/ie0492707 · DOI
  6. Bonura G., 2013, Appl. Catal., B, 140, 16, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.03.048 · DOI
  7. Xu M., 1997, Appl. Catal., A, 149, 289, 10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00275-X · DOI
  8. Jun K., 2002, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 23, 803, 10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.6.803 · DOI
  9. Yaripour F., 2005, Catal. Commun., 6, 147, 10.1016/j.catcom.2004.11.012 · DOI
  10. Liu D., 2011, Fuel, 90, 1738, 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.038 · DOI
  11. Vanoye L., 2013, Catal. Today, 215, 239, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.01.012 · DOI
  12. Hassanpour S., 2010, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 4063, 10.1021/ie9013869 · DOI
  13. Jun K. W., 2003, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 24, 106, 10.5012/bkcs.2003.24.1.106 · DOI
  14. Jiang S., 2004, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 25, 185, 10.5012/bkcs.2004.25.2.185 · DOI
  15. Vishwanathan V., 2004, Appl. Catal., A, 276, 251, 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.08.011 · DOI
  16. Migliori M., 2014, Catal. Today, 227, 138, 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.033 · DOI
  17. Li J., 2011, Catal. Today, 171, 221, 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.027 · DOI
  18. Kim J. H., 2004, Appl. Catal., A, 264, 37, 10.1016/j.apcata.2003.12.058 · DOI
  19. Ramos F. S., 2005, Catal. Today, 101, 39, 10.1016/j.cattod.2004.12.007 · DOI
  20. Bercic G., 1993, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 1035, 10.1021/ie00023a006 · DOI
  21. Mollavali M., 2008, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 3265, 10.1021/ie800051h · DOI
  22. Moradi G., 2010, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27, 1435, 10.1007/s11814-010-0238-z · DOI
  23. Lee E. Y., 2006, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 89, 115, 10.1007/s11144-006-0093-4 · DOI
  24. Sierra I., 2013, Chem. Eng. Trans., 32, 613
  25. Ha K., 2011, Appl. Catal., A, 395, 95, 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.01.025 · DOI
  26. Blaszkowski S. R., 1997, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101, 2292, 10.1021/jp962006+ · DOI
  27. Perego C., 1999, Catal. Today, 52, 133, 10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00071-1 · DOI
  28. Gates B. C., 1971, AlChE J., 17, 981, 10.1002/aic.690170435 · DOI
  29. Klusacek K., 1982, Chem. Eng. Sci., 37, 1523, 10.1016/0009-2509(82)80010-9 · DOI
  30. Kallò D., 1967, Chem. Eng, Technol., 37, 1523
  31. Than L. N., 1972, Collect. Czech. Commun., 37, 3878, 10.1135/cccc19723878 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Migliori, M., Aloise, A., Catizzone, E., & Giordano, G.
Affiliations
University of Calabria (IT)
Corresponding author
Migliori, Massimo
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2014-09-11
Volume
53
Issue
38
Pages
14885-14891
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2320734103
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Keywords
methanol dehydration, dimethyl ether, kinetic modeling, reaction kinetics, activation energy, kinetic parameters, differential reactor, integral reactor, catalyst acidity, water stability, Si/Al ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review