The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review
Abstract
In the sorption-enhanced hydrogen production process, hydrocarbon reforming, water gas shift, and CO 2 separation reactions occur simultaneously in a single reaction step over a reforming catalyst mixed with a CO 2 sorbent. Transferring CO 2 as it is formed from the gas to the solid phase shifts the normal equilibrium restrictions and allows both the reforming and water gas shift reactions to approach completion. Depending on reaction conditions, the product (dry basis) may contain as much as 98% H 2 and only ppmv levels of CO and CO 2, thereby minimizing the final H 2 purification step or even eliminating it for some applications. A number of CO 2 sorbents have been studied including calcium-based oxides, K-promoted hydrotalcite, and mixed metal oxides of lithium and sodium. The sorbent is consumed during H 2 production so that the process is intrinsically unsteady state. Process economics requires that the sorbent be regenerable and used in many reaction−regeneration cycles. Regeneration may occur via temperature swing, pressure swing, or a combination. Much of the current research is devoted to testing and improving sorbent multicycle durability. Both circulating fluid-bed reactors and dual fixed-bed reactors with alternating reaction−regeneration functions have been proposed to provide overall steady state H 2 production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
CO2 capture by solid adsorbents and their applications: current status and new trends
Wang, Q., Luo, J., Zhong, Z., & Borgna, A. (2011) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c0ee00064g · Cited by 1,611
Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review
Mondal, M. K., Balsora, H. K., & Varshney, P. (2012) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.08.006 · Cited by 1,019
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
Super-dry reforming of methane intensifies CO 2 utilization via Le Chatelier’s principle
Buelens, L. C., Galvita, V. V., Poelman, H., Detavernier, C., & Marin, G. B. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah7161 · Cited by 528
Metadata
- Authors
- Harrison, D. P.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-07-31
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6486-6501
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2092300400
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie800298z
- The paper
- Harrison, D. P. (2008). Sorption-Enhanced Hydrogen Production: A Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie800298z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.