The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofibers from Two Commercial Hardwood and Softwood Pulps
Abstract
The aim of this work was to study the mechanical fibrillation process for the preparation of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hard- and softwood cellulose pulps. The process consisted of initial refining and subsequent high-pressure homogenization. The progress in fibrillation was studied using different microscopy techniques, mechanical testing, and fiber density measurements of cellulose films prepared after different processing stages. The mechanical properties of cellulose films showed an increase in strength and stiffness with decreasing fiber size, and this stabilized after a certain number of passes in the homogenizer. Atomic force microscopy studies showed that the obtained cellulose nanofibers had diameters in the 10−25-nm range. The significant difference between the two samples was that the ultimate failure strain for cellulose films made of softwood fibers increased during the process whereas it remained constantly low for hardwood cellulose films. This difference could be due to the presence of shorter fibers and more defects in the films. An important point to note is that excessive processing reduced properties, as seen by the decrease in failure strain of softwood fiber films, and could also decrease other properties such as strength if the number of processing steps were further increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wood: Chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions
(1983) · doi:10.1515/9783110839654 · Cited by 2,846
Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., Ruokolainen, J., Laine, J., Larsson, P. T., Ikkala, O., et al. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061215p · Cited by 1,962
Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation
Fukuzumi, H., Saito, T., Iwata, T., Kumamoto, Y., & Isogai, A. (2009) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm801065u · Cited by 1,271
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Strength and barrier properties of MFC films
Syverud, K., & Stenius, P. (2009) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 · Cited by 592
Nakagaito, A. N., & Yano, H. (2005) · Applied Physics A · doi:10.1007/s00339-003-2225-2 · Cited by 545
Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites
Leitner, J., Hinterstoisser, B., Wastyn, M., Keckes, J., & Gindl, W. (2007) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9131-2 · Cited by 231
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Comparison and assessment of methods for cellulose crystallinity determination
Salem, K. S., Kasera, N. K., Rahman, M. A., Jameel, H., Habibi, Y., Eichhorn, S. J., French, A. D., Pal, L., & Lucia, L. A. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00569g · Cited by 600
Osong, S. H., Norgren, S., & Engstrand, P. (2016) · Cellulose · doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 · Cited by 434
Nanocellulose in packaging: Advances in barrier layer technologies
Ferrer, A., Pal, L., & Hubbe, M. (2017) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.012 · Cited by 382
High performance green barriers based on nanocellulose
Nair, S. S., Zhu, J., Deng, Y., & Ragauskas, A. J. (2014) · Sustainable Chemical Processes · doi:10.1186/s40508-014-0023-0 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Stelte, W., & Sanadi, A. R.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11211-11219
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W1969889120
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.