The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theoretical relations among rate constants, barriers, and Broensted slopes of chemical reactions
Abstract
A simple relation, ΔF* = (λ(1 + Δ/λ)^2)/4, derived originally for weak-overlap electron transfers, is explored in a slightly modified version for reactions with considerable resonance splitting, such as atom transfers, proton transfers, and strong-overlap electron transfers. A useful additivity property, λ_(12) = ((λ_(11) + λ_(22))/2, permits barriers ΔF* for cross-reactions to be computed from those of exchange reactions, λ_(ii)/4. Some 45 barriers, calculated from some ten others, agreed with BEBO results, within a few kilocalories per mole. The agreement is analyzed and more general models for which it might occur are considered. A functional relationship between barrier and a degree-of-reaction parameter is devised to avoid commitment to too specific a model. An example where breakdown should occur is also given. Experimental data, as well as quantum mechanical calculations of barriers, will permit further tests. Corollaries of the relation include: (1) a classification of reaction barriers in terms of intrinsic (λ_(ii)) and extrinsic (ΔF^0’) contributions, (2) a rate-constant relation k_(12) ≃ (k_(11)k_(22)K_(12)f_(12))^(1/2) and modifications thereof, (3) a calculation of the local Brønsted slope α from the intercept of the ΔF* vs. ΔF^0' plot, α = (1 + Δ/λ)/2, (4) a relation between k_H/k_D vs. ΔF^0' plots and local α’s, and ( 5 ) other relations among rate constants. Throughout, ΔF* and ΔF^0' refer to an elementary step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ru(II) polypyridine complexes: photophysics, photochemistry, eletrochemistry, and chemiluminescence
Juris, A., Balzani, V., Barigelletti, F., Campagna, S., Belser, P., & von Zelewsky, A. (1988) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/0010-8545(88)80032-8 · Cited by 4,862
Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment
Marcus, R. A. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.599 · Cited by 3,667
Self-citationProton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Excited-state proton transfer reactions I. Fundamentals and intermolecular reactions
Arnaut, L. G., & Formosinho, S. J. (1993) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry · doi:10.1016/1010-6030(93)80157-5 · Cited by 561
Mechanistic aspects of the reactions of nitric oxide with transition-metal complexes
Ford, P. C., & Lorkovic, I. M. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0000271 · Cited by 525
Metadata
- Authors
- Marcus, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1968-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 891-899
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W1998931710
- Cited by
- 1,087
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical relations among rate constants, barriers, and Broensted slopes of chemical reactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/j100849a019
- The paper
- Marcus, R. A. (1968). Theoretical relations among rate constants, barriers, and Broensted slopes of chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100849a019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.