Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tetrahedral vs Octahedral Zinc Complexes with Ligands of Biological Interest: A DFT/CDM Study

Dudev, Todor, Lim, Carmay·2000·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

To elucidate the most preferable, ground-state coordination geometry for zinc complexes in a protein environment, the free energies of isomerization between hexa- and tetracoordinated structures containing Zn 2+ bound to water and ligands of biological interest were evaluated. Density functional theory using the 6-31++G(2d,2p) basis set was employed in calculating isomerization free energies in the gas phase, while continuum dielectric theory was used to compute solvation free energies of the zinc clusters in different dielectric media. The results show that the lowest-energy ground-state coordination number of zinc bound to one acidic or two or more neutral protein ligands is 4. The observed decrease in the coordination number of zinc upon protein binding reflects primarily the requirements of the metal and ligands, rather than the constraints of the protein matrix on the metal. Our finding that the tetrahedral zinc complexes in protein cavities generally represent the optimal, least strained structures among various zinc polyhedra may explain why four-coordinate zinc is chosen to play a structural role in zinc fingers and enzymes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja0010296

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Dudev, T., & Lim, C.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2000-11-01
Volume
122
Issue
45
Pages
11146-11153
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1965069023
Cited by
232
References
2
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.