Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methane-to-Methanol Conversion by First-Row Transition-Metal Oxide Ions: ScO+, TiO+, VO+, CrO+, MnO+, FeO+, CoO+, NiO+, and CuO+

Shiota, Yoshihito, Yoshizawa, Kazunari·2000·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The reaction pathway and energetics for methane-to-methanol conversion by first-row transition-metal oxide ions (MO + s) are discussed from density functional theory (DFT) B3LYP calculations, where M is Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu. The methane-to-methanol conversion by these MO + complexes is proposed to proceed in a two-step manner via two transition states: MO + + CH 4 → OM + (CH 4 ) → [TS] → OH−M + −CH 3 → [TS] → M + (CH 3 OH) → M + + CH 3 OH. Both high-spin and low-spin potential energy surfaces are characterized in detail. A crossing between the high-spin and the low-spin potential energy surfaces occurs once near the exit channel for ScO +, TiO +, VO +, CrO +, and MnO +, but it occurs twice in the entrance and exit channels for FeO +, CoO +, and NiO + . Our calculations strongly suggest that spin inversion can occur near a crossing region of potential energy surfaces and that it can play a significant role in decreasing the barrier heights of these transition states. The reaction pathway from methane to methanol is uphill in energy on the early MO + complexes (ScO +, TiO +, and VO + ); thus, these complexes are not good mediators for the formation of methanol. On the other hand, the late MO + complexes (FeO +, NiO +, and CuO + ) are expected from the general energy profiles of the reaction pathways to efficiently convert methane to methanol. Measured reaction efficiencies and methanol branching ratios for MnO +, FeO +, CoO +, and NiO + are rationalized from the energetics of the high-spin and the low-spin potential energy surfaces. The energy diagram for the methane-to-methanol conversion by CuO + is downhill toward the product direction, and thus CuO + is likely to be an excellent mediator for methane hydroxylation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja0017965

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Shiota, Y., & Yoshizawa, K.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2000-11-21
Volume
122
Issue
49
Pages
12317-12326
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1999943753
Cited by
285
References
3
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane-to-Methanol Conversion by First-Row Transition-Metal Oxide Ions: ScO+, TiO+, VO+, CrO+, MnO+, FeO+, CoO+, NiO+, and CuO+. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0017965
The paper
Shiota, Y., & Yoshizawa, K. (2000). Methane-to-Methanol Conversion by First-Row Transition-Metal Oxide Ions: ScO+, TiO+, VO+, CrO+, MnO+, FeO+, CoO+, NiO+, and CuO+. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0017965

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.