The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the efficiencies of several natural and synthetic antioxidants in aqueous SDS [sodium dodecyl sulfate] micelle solutions
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTComparison of the efficiencies of several natural and synthetic antioxidants in aqueous SDS [sodium dodecyl sulfate] micelle solutionsWilliam A. Pryor, Theodore. Strickland, and Daniel F. ChurchCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7, 2224–2229Publication Date (Print):March 1, 1988Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 March 1988https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00215a036https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00215a036research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views770Altmetric-Citations204LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays
Huang, D., Ou, B., & Prior, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030723c · Cited by 6,162
Frankel, E. N., & Meyer, A. S. (2000) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/1097-0010(200010)80:13<1925::aid-jsfa714>3.0.co;2-4 · Cited by 1,120
Antioxidant functions of carotenoids
Krinsky, N. I. (1989) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(89)90143-3 · Cited by 926
Review of methods to determine chain-breaking antioxidant activity in food
ROGINSKY, V, & LISSI, E. (2005) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.004 · Cited by 855
The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an overview
Chisolm, G. M., & Steinberg, D. (2000) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00344-0 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Pryor, W. A., Strickland, T., & Church, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1988-03
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2224-2229
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2059639003
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the efficiencies of several natural and synthetic antioxidants in aqueous SDS [sodium dodecyl sulfate] micelle solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja00215a036
- The paper
- Pryor, W. A., Strickland, T., & Church, D. F. (1988). Comparison of the efficiencies of several natural and synthetic antioxidants in aqueous SDS [sodium dodecyl sulfate] micelle solutions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00215a036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
