The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catalytic Water Formation on Platinum: A First-Principles Study
Abstract
The study of catalytic behavior begins with one seemingly simple process, namely the hydrogenation of O to H2O on platinum. Despite the apparent simplicity its mechanism has been much debated. We have used density functional theory with gradient corrections to examine microscopic reaction pathways for several elementary steps implicated in this fundamental catalytic process. We find that H2O formation from chemisorbed O and H atoms is a highly activated process. The largest barrier along this route, with a value of approximately 1 eV, is the addition of the first H to O to produce OH. Once formed, however, OH groups are easily hydrogenated to H2O with a barrier of approximately 0.2 eV. Disproportionation reactions with 1:1 and 2:1 stoichiometries of H2O and O have been examined as alternative routes for OH formation. Both stoichiometries of reaction produce OH groups with barriers that are much lower than that associated with the O + H reaction. H2O, therefore, acts as an autocatalyst in the overall H2O formation process. Disproportionation with a 2:1 stoichiometry is thermodynamically and kinetically favored over disproportionation with a 1:1 stoichiometry. This highlights an additional (promotional) role of the second H2O molecule in this process. In support of our previous suggestion that the key intermediate in the low-temperature H2O formation reaction is a mixed OH and H2O overlayer we find that there is a very large barrier for the dissociation of the second H2O molecule in the 2:1 disproportionation process. We suggest that the proposed intermediate is then hydrogenated to H2O through a very facile proton-transfer mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
Zheng, Y., Jiao, Y., Vasileff, A., & Qiao, S. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201710556 · Cited by 1,489
Mhadeshwar, A. B., & Vlachos, D. G. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp048698g · Cited by 159
Hyman, M. P., & Medlin, J. W. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045155y · Cited by 150
Ligand-confined two-dimensional rhodium hydride boosts hydrogen evolution
Fan, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Li, M., Cai, Y., Ji, Q., Zhao, Z., Hou, G., Li, A., Zhou, W., et al. (2023) · Matter · doi:10.1016/j.matt.2023.09.003 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Michaelides, A., & Hu, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04-14
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4235-4242
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1995152244
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalytic Water Formation on Platinum: A First-Principles Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja003576x
- The paper
- Michaelides, A., & Hu, P. (2001). Catalytic Water Formation on Platinum: A First-Principles Study. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja003576x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.